2016
DOI: 10.1080/10130950.2017.1328806
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gains for women from farmland redistribution in South Africa and sustainable pathways out of poverty – insights from recent evidence

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 3 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For instance, Zhang and Wan (2009) and Li & Chen (2019) used a panel data model from China's Rural Household Survey (CRHS) to estimate poverty vulnerability. Scholars constantly used the Sustainable Livelihoods Framework (SLF) to calculate the risk of vulnerability and sensitivity to poverty (Motala et al, 2016;Park et al, 2012;Zada et al, 2019). Other methods were also employed, including latent transition analysis (LTA) (Acconcia et al, 2020), which emphasized the internal processing abilities (Ellis & Bahiigwa, 2003) and the risk method, which was based on a framework emphasizing household production and living (Dercon, 2002).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, Zhang and Wan (2009) and Li & Chen (2019) used a panel data model from China's Rural Household Survey (CRHS) to estimate poverty vulnerability. Scholars constantly used the Sustainable Livelihoods Framework (SLF) to calculate the risk of vulnerability and sensitivity to poverty (Motala et al, 2016;Park et al, 2012;Zada et al, 2019). Other methods were also employed, including latent transition analysis (LTA) (Acconcia et al, 2020), which emphasized the internal processing abilities (Ellis & Bahiigwa, 2003) and the risk method, which was based on a framework emphasizing household production and living (Dercon, 2002).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%