2020
DOI: 10.1002/mmce.22369
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gain and isolation enhancement of patch antenna using L‐slotted mushroom electromagnetic bandgap

Abstract: In this paper, the application of the L‐slotted mushroom electromagnetic bandgap (LMEBG) structure to patch antenna and antenna array is investigated. A coaxial fed patch antenna and antenna array are designed at 5.8 GHz, center frequency for ISM band (5.725‐5.875 GHz). Two layers of LMEBG are placed around the patch to achieve a gain enhancement of 1.9 dB. Measured results show a bandwidth enhancement of 300 MHz with an additional resonant frequency at 5.6 GHz with 4.5 dB of gain. A 5 × 2 array of LMEBG is us… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The performance of the proposed EBG is compared with earlier reported unit cells in Table 1. Compared to unit cells in [4,[6][7][8][9][10][11], the proposed geometry achieves a higher bandgap with comparable unit-cell periodicity and thickness. Moreover relative to mushroom-type EBGs in [4,[6][7][8], the proposed uniplanar configuration has an added advantage of less fabrication complexity due to the absence of metallic via.…”
Section: Ebg As Frequency-selective Surfacementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The performance of the proposed EBG is compared with earlier reported unit cells in Table 1. Compared to unit cells in [4,[6][7][8][9][10][11], the proposed geometry achieves a higher bandgap with comparable unit-cell periodicity and thickness. Moreover relative to mushroom-type EBGs in [4,[6][7][8], the proposed uniplanar configuration has an added advantage of less fabrication complexity due to the absence of metallic via.…”
Section: Ebg As Frequency-selective Surfacementioning
confidence: 99%
“…EBG is broadly classified as mushroom [2] and uniplanar type [3], which exhibits properties such as surface wave suppression within its frequency bandgap and in-phase reflection for plane wave incidence. EBG is integrated with a planar array for mutual coupling reduction [4] and low profile compact antenna design [5]. In recent years, different miniaturized mushroom [6][7][8] and uniplanar EBG [9][10][11] geometries are reported and their applications are presented in detail.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The EBG surrounded with patch antenna gives a good performance compared to a conventional patch antenna. The implementation of various EBG structures incorporated with antenna are described in [4]- [7]. Tan et al [4] introduced split EBG structure to reduce the mutual coupling between dual band mender-line antenna array.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Khan et al [6] proposed UC EBG and ground stub combinedly to reduce the mutual coupling between MIMO antenna. Venkata SR et al [7] proposed L slotted MEBG for patch antenna to enhance the gain and reduce the mutual coupling between array.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At present, the most widely used resonant antennas are mainly patch antennas and dielectric resonator antennas (DRA). 1,2 DRA evolved from dielectric waveguides and dielectric resonators. The first DRA is a cylindrical structure, which is proposed in Reference 3.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%