Bipolar/BiCMOS Circuits and Technology, 2004. Proceedings of the 2004 Meeting
DOI: 10.1109/bipol.2004.1365743
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

GaAs HBT for power applications

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Cost Issues: There has been an everlasting debate on the cost of SiGe BiCMOS in comparison to III-V device technologies (e.g., InGaP/GaAs) for power amplification in the frequency range where both types of devices are capable of performing the same functions [25]. One of the major supports for the claim that SiGe BiCMOS is not less expensive than the III-V counterpart is that more chip area will be consumed by SiGe HBTs in order to achieve the same RF power level with comparable PAE (other supports include the processing complexity of SiGe BiCMOS).…”
Section: Further Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cost Issues: There has been an everlasting debate on the cost of SiGe BiCMOS in comparison to III-V device technologies (e.g., InGaP/GaAs) for power amplification in the frequency range where both types of devices are capable of performing the same functions [25]. One of the major supports for the claim that SiGe BiCMOS is not less expensive than the III-V counterpart is that more chip area will be consumed by SiGe HBTs in order to achieve the same RF power level with comparable PAE (other supports include the processing complexity of SiGe BiCMOS).…”
Section: Further Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because of the low breakdown voltages for fast CMOS devices, other technologies, such as GaAs HBT [26], [27], Si bipolar [28], [29], SiGe HBT [30]- [32], and low-voltage LDMOS [33], [34], have so far dominated the small-size PAs. See [35] for CMOS vs. GaAs comparison for mobile phone PAs, and [36] for comparison of different bipolar technologies for similar applications.…”
Section: A Cmos For Wireless Socmentioning
confidence: 99%