2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0006-291x(02)02335-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

G-CSF stimulates angiogenesis and promotes tumor growth: potential contribution of bone marrow-derived endothelial progenitor cells

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

7
131
2
5

Year Published

2007
2007
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 182 publications
(145 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
7
131
2
5
Order By: Relevance
“…25 CRC patients also displayed higher levels of G-CSF which has been reported to stimulate angiogenesis and promotes tumor growth. 28 More surprising were the observed higher levels IFN-g which has been reported to exert tumor-suppressive functions protecting the host against tumor formation. 5,10,29,30 However its activity is probably counteracted in the presence of several opposing signals such as those exerted by the other cytokines found to be increased in patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…25 CRC patients also displayed higher levels of G-CSF which has been reported to stimulate angiogenesis and promotes tumor growth. 28 More surprising were the observed higher levels IFN-g which has been reported to exert tumor-suppressive functions protecting the host against tumor formation. 5,10,29,30 However its activity is probably counteracted in the presence of several opposing signals such as those exerted by the other cytokines found to be increased in patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our results suggest that a similar process can also occur independently of tumor with drug-induced up-regulation of multiple proangiogenic growth factors. In this regard, a number of studies have shown that angiogenesis can be induced or amplified by G-CSF (18), SCF (19), SDF-1␣ (20), and osteopontin (21), by diverse mechanisms, including mobilization of circulating bone-marrow-derived proangiogenic cell populations (22), such as endothelial progenitor cells (23). Such effects could conceivably contribute to the rapid vascular ''rebound'' in mouse tumors observed within 1 week of terminating therapy with an RTKI similar in nature to sunitinib (16), results that could clearly have implications for whether a continuous vs. discontinuous schedule of treatment using such drugs would be superior.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, our results were accompanied by a total absence of toxicity and in a heavily pretreated, irinotecan-resistant population with progressive disease. Moreover, G-CSF was not administered to patients receiving metronomic irinotecan chemotherapy and as such this could have an advantage, not only in terms of cost but also in terms of avoiding the possibility that the exogenous G-CSF might promote angiogenesis by mobilising circulating endothelial progenitor cells (CEPs) (Natori et al, 2002;Shaked and Kerbel, 2007). Our results suggest that metronomic irinotecan chemotherapy could work through a mechanism of action that is not related to the direct cytotoxic effect on tumour cells but rather through an antiangiogenic activity targeting proliferating endothelial cells as shown in the preclinical setting.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%