G

Berridge, G. R.; Lloyd, Lorna

doi:10.1057/9781137017611_7

Cited by 11 publications

(11 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…For representations in a single text like Kennan’s Long Telegram can constitute how entire institutions and even other international actors see world events. These analytical outcomes address an old concern in the study of diplomacy raised in the English School’s unfulfilled query into the diplomatic ‘pristine form of messengers’ (Bull, 2002: 175; Neumann, 2003), Realist focus on the instrumental power of communication (Berridge, 1989, 2001, 2002; Kissinger, 1994), Constructivist readings of normative influence (Fisher, 2012, 2013a, 2013b), as well as Critical approaches that regard it as constitutive of the international (Sending et al, 2015).…”

Section: Introductory Démarchementioning

confidence: 82%

Retrieving how diplomacy writes subjects, space and time: a methodological contribution

Orellana

2019

European Journal of International Relations

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

How does diplomacy describe international actors? Diplomatic practices observe, analyse, prioritise and constitute information that is ultimately committed to text. Drawing on post-structuralist approaches to identity, diplomacy and textuality, this paper argues for consideration of the unique role of diplomatic text in constituting the state and especially its representation and understanding of Self and Other. It consequently develops a methodology to empirically analyse how the text of diplomatic communication describes people, places, time, politics, and informs policy. The analytical method proposed adjusts and expands post-structuralist discourse analysis, adapting it to the intertextual study of large collections of diplomatic knowledge production documents. It firstly determines data selection in relation to diplomacy’s own theory. Secondly, it develops an approach to retrieve how any diplomatic text constitutes representations of subjects and their contexts. Thirdly, it follows the development of representations across diplomatic knowledge production, identifying when they come to influence other international actors. This approach is demonstrated in the analysis of America’s 1945–1948 diplomatic road to involvement in Vietnam, showing how diplomacy’s representation of actors were vital to US involvement, and identifying hitherto unconsidered events, descriptions and actors. These analytics contribute to and empirically substantiate understanding of how diplomacy constitutes Self and Other, informs policy and shapes world politics.

show abstract

Section: Introductory Démarchementioning

confidence: 82%

Retrieving how diplomacy writes subjects, space and time: a methodological contribution

Orellana

2019

European Journal of International Relations

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Obviously, diplomacy is a tool use by States to determine disputes, form alliances, negotiate treaties, strengthen economic relations, promote cultural and military exchanges, and for a variety of other purposes (Berridge, 2010). It encapsulates a broad arrangement of shifting rules, etiquette, goals, procedures, and agreements.…”

Section: Conceptual Architecturementioning

confidence: 99%

“…Berridge (2010), add that Diplomacy takes place in both bilateral and multilateral contexts. Bilateral diplomacy is the term used for communication between two States, while multilateral diplomacy involves contacts between several States often within the institutionalized setting of an international organization.…”

Section: Conceptual Architecturementioning

confidence: 99%

Russia-United Kingdom Diplomatic Crisis over Salisbury Nerve Agent Attack: An Analysis

Mark¹

2018

IJLPA

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Russia-United Kingdom Diplomatic ties have been banter of ally-crises-ally relations and have not fared well since its first diplomatic contact in 1553 during the era of Tsardom of Russia, and currently at its most tensed point occasioned by the alleged poison attack on Sergei Skripal in Salisbury. While it remains unclear which exactly of the Novichok variants were used to poison Skripal and his daughter? The medical effect of the poison is well understood and Britain with their allies points at Russia as the culprit. This single act has turn sour the diplomatic relations of these great powers. However, it raised multiplicity of arguments among scholars and analysts, who try to highlight and analyse views on who seeks to gain from the cold war between the power megalomaniacs. It is on this ground that the paper looks at the diplomatic crisis between Russia and United Kingdom over the attempted poisoning of Skripal and his daughter. The paper employed a combination of Psycho-Cultural Theory of Conflict and Conspiracy theory as it framework, using a qualitative analysis which relies on secondary data as its source of information to explore the problematic. It further examined if there were any similarities between the Salisbury attack and other attacks carried out in United Kingdom. The paper concludes with the implications of the attack, notes that despite Russia-United Kingdom crisis prone diplomatic relation over Salisbury nerve agent attack, they have an obligation to cooperate in the United Nation should an international conflict arise, as they encompass two of the five permanent members in the UN Security Council giving them the power to veto the approval of UN Security Council resolutions should any quick decision be required. Hence, the pronged disagreement is an interruption to the adoption of quick resolutions, particularly with the emergent danger of conflict and crises on the Korean headland and the on-going civil turbulence in Syria. The paper recommends among others; for Putin to take the opportunity of a new term to start afresh and rebuild ties with the United Kingdom, following the full dictates of diplomatic principles.

show abstract

“…Es un instrumento que requiere competencias profesionales, habilidades, destrezas, conocimientos y actitudes para resolver con éxito las tareas asignadas en la ejecución de la actividad exterior. Es una actividad principal de la acción exterior y cuenta con normas, reglamentos, costumbres y usos que han moldeado las relaciones internacionales (Berridge, 2015). Las empresas y las organizaciones privadas han aprendido el valor de la diplomacia para la conducción de asuntos internacionales y han capturado esos aprendizajes para transformarlos en parte de las tareas asignadas a la dirección.…”

Section: Dinámica Y Alcance De La Diplomacia Corporativaunclassified

Cuatro funciones estratégicas de la diplomacia corporativa

Manfredi-Sánchez

2017

internationalrelation

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

La diplomacia corporativa es el desarrollo instrumental de la estrategia que ordena la relación con los poderes públicos y privados en un entorno complejo y globalizado. Las corporaciones actúan como poderes diplomáticos en la representación, la negociación, la protección y la promoción de los intereses, las cuatro funciones básicas de la diplomacia que establece la Convención de Viena de 1961. La tarea de la diplomacia corporativa es una fuente de innovación directiva y una oportunidad de desarrollo profesional.

show abstract

G

Cited by 11 publications

References 0 publications

Retrieving how diplomacy writes subjects, space and time: a methodological contribution

Retrieving how diplomacy writes subjects, space and time: a methodological contribution

Russia-United Kingdom Diplomatic Crisis over Salisbury Nerve Agent Attack: An Analysis

Cuatro funciones estratégicas de la diplomacia corporativa

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About