2016 IEEE 20th Jubilee International Conference on Intelligent Engineering Systems (INES) 2016
DOI: 10.1109/ines.2016.7555116
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fuzzy-fusion approach for land cover classification

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Data fusion approaches, based on fuzzy logic techniques, are emerging as a technique for land classification to perform correct reasoning inferences (Hyder, Shahbazian, and Waltz 2012;Santos, Andre Mora, and Joao 2016). The FIF algorithm -basis of our approachis based on fuzzy logic and specialized decision-making aggregation operators and was applied to spacecraft landing with hazard avoidance (Bourdarias et al 2010;Câmara et al 2015) as well as for land cover classification (A. D. Mora et al 2015;A.…”
Section: Data Fusion Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Data fusion approaches, based on fuzzy logic techniques, are emerging as a technique for land classification to perform correct reasoning inferences (Hyder, Shahbazian, and Waltz 2012;Santos, Andre Mora, and Joao 2016). The FIF algorithm -basis of our approachis based on fuzzy logic and specialized decision-making aggregation operators and was applied to spacecraft landing with hazard avoidance (Bourdarias et al 2010;Câmara et al 2015) as well as for land cover classification (A. D. Mora et al 2015;A.…”
Section: Data Fusion Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As mentioned before, here, we follow an inference scheme that uses reinforcement aggregation operators to perform the fusion of images [1]. This fusion process with specialized aggregation operators is based on other work performed by some co-authors [18].…”
Section: Reinforcement Inference Schemementioning
confidence: 99%
“…• ⊕ j = aggregation operator; It should be noted that performing inference with reinforcement operators is an innovative method to determine a more positive or negative reinforcement of the rule's firing level and respective classification certainty for each class (for more details, see [1]). In the same article, it was found that the Uninorm reinforcement aggregation operator was better for classification of satellite images; hence, it is the one considered in this comparative study.…”
Section: Reinforcement Inference Schemementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations