2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.febslet.2015.07.022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fuzzy complexes: Specific binding without complete folding

Abstract: a b s t r a c tSpecific molecular recognition is assumed to require a well-defined set of contacts and devoid of conformational and interaction ambiguities. Growing experimental evidence demonstrates however, that structural multiplicity or dynamic disorder can be retained in protein complexes, termed as fuzziness. Fuzzy regions establish alternative contacts between specific partners usually via transient interactions. Nature often tailors the dynamic properties of these segments via post-translational modifi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
166
0
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 185 publications
(177 citation statements)
references
References 129 publications
(124 reference statements)
9
166
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In the case of dynamic disorder, the IDRs retain conformational freedom within the assembly and will be referred to as fuzzy regions or dynamic IDRs, to distinguish them from IDRs that fold upon binding. These dynamic IDRs within higher-order structures may link separate binding modules to increase their local concentration, exert transient interactions to influence adjacent binding elements, facilitate allostery, or promote intramolecular autoinhibition (Fuxreiter, 2012; Sharma et al, 2015) via well-characterized mechanisms (see examples in FuzDB, http://protdyn-database.org). …”
Section: Fuzzy Structures In Higher-order Assembliesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the case of dynamic disorder, the IDRs retain conformational freedom within the assembly and will be referred to as fuzzy regions or dynamic IDRs, to distinguish them from IDRs that fold upon binding. These dynamic IDRs within higher-order structures may link separate binding modules to increase their local concentration, exert transient interactions to influence adjacent binding elements, facilitate allostery, or promote intramolecular autoinhibition (Fuxreiter, 2012; Sharma et al, 2015) via well-characterized mechanisms (see examples in FuzDB, http://protdyn-database.org). …”
Section: Fuzzy Structures In Higher-order Assembliesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although an interaction of an IDP/IDPR with its binding partner is often accompanied by a disorder-to-order transition resulting in a (partial) folding of an IDP (9, 38, 50, 53, 54, 56 -59), many IDPs/IDPRs form fuzzy complexes in which they remain predominantly disordered, at least outside the binding interface (61)(62)(63)(64)(65)(66)(67)(68). Similar to the disordered regions of unbound IDPs, these under-folded, fuzzy regions of bound IDPs/IDPRs have multiple functions, e.g.…”
Section: Binding-induced Under-folding: Fuzziness Of Disorder-based Cmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similar to the disordered regions of unbound IDPs, these under-folded, fuzzy regions of bound IDPs/IDPRs have multiple functions, e.g. serving as alternative contacts for specific partners, usually via transient interactions and finetuned by PTMs (68).…”
Section: Binding-induced Under-folding: Fuzziness Of Disorder-based Cmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This type of transient interaction is termed a fuzzy complex, as reviewed in Ref. [61] and highlights roles for intrinsically disordered regions in regulation outside the mechanism of folding on binding.…”
Section: Specificity and Function Through Proteinprotein Interactionsmentioning
confidence: 99%