2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.sbi.2016.05.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mechanisms of DNA-binding specificity and functional gene regulation by transcription factors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
38
0
4

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
0
38
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…[50] In addition to the genomic co-localization data, the absence of IL1A response to dioxin in TCF21 knockdown, and our studies investigating the phasing of binding site placement also suggests some form of direct or indirect molecular interaction. The striking difference between functional annotations for the two categories of steric relationship are consistent with different functional interactions between AHR–ARNT and TCF21 in the context of DNA binding.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…[50] In addition to the genomic co-localization data, the absence of IL1A response to dioxin in TCF21 knockdown, and our studies investigating the phasing of binding site placement also suggests some form of direct or indirect molecular interaction. The striking difference between functional annotations for the two categories of steric relationship are consistent with different functional interactions between AHR–ARNT and TCF21 in the context of DNA binding.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…Nevertheless, it is tempting to speculate that cooperative binding of more than one TF regulates expression of developmental genes. Gene regulation through protein‐protein and protein‐DNA networks has previously been described for eukaryotic TFs (Smith and Matthews, ) and may explain why only small shifts in PRO1‐dependent gene expression were observed in the qRT‐PCR for some of the genes investigated. However, esdC expression is drastically increased in GFP‐PRO1_OE, indicating that esdC expression directly depends on PRO1.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…47,48 Many of these proteins, for example the lac repressor, use one conformation to carry out nonspecific DNA binding during scanning and switch to a different conformation upon specific target recognition. 49 While further experiments will be required to test these possibilities for the decapping complex, regulation of mRNA decapping may be controlled by protein-protein interactions that manipulate the conformational transitions of Dcp2 to promote or inhibit different steps in the catalytic cycle.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%