Fuzzy cognitive maps approach for analysing the domino effect of factors affecting supply chain resilience: a fashion industry case study

Ciarapica, Filippo Emanuele; Marcucci, Giulio; Mazzuto, Giovanni

doi:10.1080/00207543.2019.1680893

Cited by 46 publications

(37 citation statements)

References 79 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“… Ponomarov and Holcomb (2009) ; Remko (2020) ; Kumar & Anbanandam (2020) ; Asamoah et al (2020) ; Kahiluoto et al (2020) ; Aslam et al (2020) ; Shekarian & Mellat Parast (2020) ; Piprani et al (2020) ; Mohammed et al (2020) ; Yu et al (2019) ; Ivanov & Sokolov (2019) ; Tan et al (2019) ; López & Ishizaka. (2019) ; Thomas & Mahanty (2019) ; Mikhail et al (2019) ; Singh et al (2019) ; Scholten et al (2019) ; Bevilacqua et al (2019) ; Rajesh (2016) ; Hosseini & Ivanov (2020) ; Behzadi et al (2020) ; Lohmer et al (2020) ; Li & Zobel (2020) . I19 Supply chain risk management SC risk management refers to the coordinated approach among the members of a supply chain for identifying and managing supply chain risk in order to reduce supply chain vulnerability Jüttner et al (2003); Munir et al (2020) ; Birkel & Hartmann (2020) ; Roscoe et al (2020) ; Kbah et al (2020) ; Shahbaz et al (2020) ; Baryannis et al (2019) ; Chowdhury et al (2019) ; Snoeck et al 2019 ).…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Sustainable supply chain management towards disruption and organizational ambidexterity: A data driven analysis

Bui

Tsai

Tseng

et al. 2021

Sustainable Production and Consumption

151

119

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Balancing sustainability and disruption of supply chains requires organizational ambidexterity. Sustainable supply chains prioritize efficiency and economies of scale and may not have sufficient redundancy to withstand disruptive events. There is a developing body of literature that attempts to reconcile these two aspects. This study gives a data-driven literature review of sustainable supply chain management trends toward ambidexterity and disruption. The critical review reveals temporal trends and geographic distribution of literature. A hybrid of data-driven analysis approach based on content and bibliometric analyses, fuzzy Delphi method, entropy weight method, and fuzzy decision-making trial and evaluation laboratory is used on 273 keywords and 22 indicators obtained based on the experts’ evaluation. The most important indicators are identified as supply chain agility, supply chain coordination, supply chain finance, supply chain flexibility, supply chain resilience, and sustainability. The regions show different tendencies compared with others. Asia and Oceania, Latin America and the Caribbean, and Africa are the regions needs improvement, while Europe and North America show distinct apprehensions on supply chain network design. The main contribution of this review is the identification of the knowledge frontier, which then leads to a discussion of prospects for future studies and practical industry implementation.

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Sustainable supply chain management towards disruption and organizational ambidexterity: A data driven analysis

Bui

Tsai

Tseng

et al. 2021

Sustainable Production and Consumption

151

119

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The ability of the supply chain to generate competitive strategies according to the needs of the market (possibly also affected by the disruption) that will allow it to recover its previous share and situation or even improve it. 10 4.31% [2,33,126,163,169,170,214,219,223,225] Innovation The ability to create joint strategies to manage risk more efficiently. Openness to learning and joint decision making.…”

Section: Disruptive Environment Awarenessmentioning

confidence: 99%

A Conceptual Framework to Manage Resilience and Increase Sustainability in the Supply Chain

2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The challenges of global economies foster supply chains to have to increase their processes of collaboration and dependence between their nodes, generating an increase in the level of vulnerability to possible impacts and interruptions in their operations that may affect their sustainability. This has developed an emerging area of interest in supply chain management, considering resilience management as a strategic capability of companies, and causing an increase in this area of research. Additionally, supply chains should deal with the three dimensions of sustainability (economic, environmental, and social dimensions) by incorporating the three types of objectives in their strategy. Thus, there is a need to integrate both resilience and sustainability in supply chain management to increase competitiveness. In this paper, a systematic literature review is undertaken to analyze resilience management and its connection to increase supply chain sustainability. In the review, 232 articles published from 2000 to February 2020 in peer-reviewed journals in the Scopus and ScienceDirect databases are analyzed, classified, and synthesized. With the results, this paper develops a conceptual framework that integrates the fundamental elements for analyzing, measuring, and managing resilience to increase sustainability in the supply chain. Finally, conclusions, limitations, and future research lines are exposed.

show abstract

“…This situation compounds other Indian products' sales in the international market due to stricter regulations in other countries. On the other hand, the fashion industry is typically characterised by a short product life cycle and high demand volatility (Moon et al, 2009;Bevilacqua et al 2020). Moreover, a high requirement of strategic and manufacturing flexibility is required.…”

Section: Theoretical Background and Hypotheses Generationmentioning

confidence: 99%

Managing global supply chain risks: effects of the industry sector

Srivastava

Rogers

2021

International Journal of Logistics Research and Applications

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Despite the abundance of articles addressing global supply chain risks and their mitigation strategies, there are surprisingly few insights into how different industries manage global supply chain risks while internationalising abroad. There are conflicting results from previous researches that specific global supply chain risk management practices work in one industry but not in others. We believe that in each industry sector, the global supply chain risks and their mitigation strategies differ. We used profile deviation and ideal profile methodology to identify top performers in three industry sectors (Audit, Finance and Consulting, Automotive, and IT and Software) and evaluated their best practices towards managing global supply chain risks. This study used an online survey to gather information on how Indian executives across these industries manage global supply chain risks during their internationalisation process and found the 'ideal' risk mitigation profiles for all three industries. These findings provide new insights to practitioners as they will serve as a useful reference tool for Indian executives planning to internationalise.

show abstract

Fuzzy cognitive maps approach for analysing the domino effect of factors affecting supply chain resilience: a fashion industry case study

Cited by 46 publications

References 79 publications

Sustainable supply chain management towards disruption and organizational ambidexterity: A data driven analysis

Sustainable supply chain management towards disruption and organizational ambidexterity: A data driven analysis

A Conceptual Framework to Manage Resilience and Increase Sustainability in the Supply Chain

Managing global supply chain risks: effects of the industry sector

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About