2021
DOI: 10.1007/s12528-021-09279-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fuzzy-based active learning for predicting student academic performance using autoML: a step-wise approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Tsiakmaki et al introduce a fuzzy‐based active learning method for predicting students' academic performance which combines, in a modular way, autoML practices. Their experimental results revealing that the proposed method for the accurate prediction of students at risk of failure has better performance compared with the classical classifier 130 . Hussain et al proposed a method to predict students' performance by combining unsupervised clustering and association rule mining methods with supervised classification methods 77 …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tsiakmaki et al introduce a fuzzy‐based active learning method for predicting students' academic performance which combines, in a modular way, autoML practices. Their experimental results revealing that the proposed method for the accurate prediction of students at risk of failure has better performance compared with the classical classifier 130 . Hussain et al proposed a method to predict students' performance by combining unsupervised clustering and association rule mining methods with supervised classification methods 77 …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kotsiantis, S. has 10 out of 12 publications on predicting student performance using different models or machine learning algorithms. For instance, the studies Alachiotis et al (2022) and Tsiakmaki et al (2021) use fuzzy logic-based automated machine learning and supervised machine learning methods to predict student performance, respectively. Alachiotis et al (2022) also showed that through a voting generalization procedure involving three of the most accurate classifiers and the default parameters of learning algorithms, the prediction outcome is much higher and more accurate than only using a single-tuned learning algorithm.…”
Section: Current Research Areas and Authors For Collaborationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Predictive analytics may have the potential to support the broader science of learning and guide pedagogical practices in learning and instruction. A lot of studies have been carried out that revealed the efficiency of methods for the accurate prediction of students at risk of failure, such as (a) fuzzy-based active learning methods for predicting students' academic performance, which combines, in a modular way, AutoML (Automated Machine Learning Algorithms) practices [8]; (b) semi-supervised classification tasks for student performance or student dropout prediction [9]; and (c) the comparison of the co-training method with semi-supervised and supervised methods [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%