2002
DOI: 10.1002/fut.10038
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Futures price limit moves as options

Abstract: This note demonstrates that an asset's price in an environment with price limit rules can be replicated by the price of a portfolio consisting of a riskless asset and two synthetic options. A procedure is developed to unbundle the unobservable option values imbedded in the actual futures price and impute a theoretical true futures price. Using this framework, evidence from the Treasury Bond futures market suggests that theoretical true futures prices diverge from actual futures prices, on average, 3 h prior to… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
7
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In futures markets, Arak and Cook (1997), Berkman and Steenbeek (1998), and Hall and Kofman (2001) find no magnet effect, whereas Holder et al (2002) and Belcher et al (2003) find evidence of it. Results from stock markets also conflict: Cho et al (2003) and Nath (2003) find support for the magnet effect, but they cannot explain theoretically why it occurs only when the price approaches the upper limit (Cho et al, 2003) or the lower limit (Nath 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…In futures markets, Arak and Cook (1997), Berkman and Steenbeek (1998), and Hall and Kofman (2001) find no magnet effect, whereas Holder et al (2002) and Belcher et al (2003) find evidence of it. Results from stock markets also conflict: Cho et al (2003) and Nath (2003) find support for the magnet effect, but they cannot explain theoretically why it occurs only when the price approaches the upper limit (Cho et al, 2003) or the lower limit (Nath 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…However, two other studies use a different approach and find support for the magnet effect. Holder, Ma, and Mallett (2002) show that an asset's price in an environment with price-limit rules can be replicated by the price of a portfolio that consists of a risk-less asset and two synthetic options. In other words, the futures price movement is equivalent to that of a portfolio that consists of a long position in the risk-less asset for the amount of the discounted difference between the previous closing price and the limit size, a long position in a call with the strike price equal to the lower limit price, and a short position in a call with the strike price equal to the higher limit price.…”
Section: Futures Marketsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kodres (1993) investigates this issue by modeling the volatility around limit events. Holder, Ma, and Mallett (2002) and Chance (1994) show the reversal of futures prices after limit move by using an option‐based model, and Chen (1998) finds little evidence to support the overreaction hypothesis in futures markets. On the other hand, Chung (1991) in Korea, Chen (1993) in Taiwan, Kim and Rhee (1997) in Tokyo, Phylaktis, Kavussanos, and Manalis (1999) in Greece, and Bildik and Elekdag (2004) in Turkey find no evidence that price limits reduce volatility.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%