1985
DOI: 10.2307/1911732
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Future Investment Constraints Reduce Present Investment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0
1

Year Published

1986
1986
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Since the installation cost function is convex, cost minimization implies that expected future decreases in investment should be spread out over time. See D'Autume and Michel (1985) for a similar result. Because italicDARitalicit is measured in terms of market value, it should capitalize the above effects of any expected future constraints.…”
mentioning
confidence: 58%
“…Since the installation cost function is convex, cost minimization implies that expected future decreases in investment should be spread out over time. See D'Autume and Michel (1985) for a similar result. Because italicDARitalicit is measured in terms of market value, it should capitalize the above effects of any expected future constraints.…”
mentioning
confidence: 58%
“…Esta tipología de regímenes de desempleo en función del signo del exceso de demanda en cada uno de los mercados (bienes, trabajo) es expuesto en Malinvaud (1977). 30 Dado que estas dos teorías de equilibrios con precios fijos engloba los casos keynesiano y clásico, tal como lo pretendía hacer el modelo IS-LM y que esta teoría se propone reemplazar, sus promotores se designan como 29 Para una comparación de los diferentes tipos de desequilibrios, ver Benassy (1983), d'Autume (1985. 30 El desempleo keynesiano es caracterizado por un exceso de oferta en los dos mercados, y el desempleo clásico es caracterizado por un exceso de oferta de trabajo y un exceso de demanda de bienes.…”
Section: A De Los Equilibrios Con Precios Fijos a Las Rigideces Nomin...unclassified
“…Therefore, his contribution would have been part of an alternative approach to monetary theory allegedly embodied by Dennis H. Robertson (1933), Karl Brunner (1951), and Sho Chieh Tsiang (1966), and in which budget constraints were modified to account for the significance of money in transactions. The second interpretation of the 1967 article was expressed by D'Autume (1985) and De Boyer des Roches (2002). It asserted that the projects underlying the 1965 and 1967 articles rested on two logically distinct ideas: the "dual-decision" process and the circulation of money through the economy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%