2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.jog.2011.06.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Future directions in subduction modeling

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
103
0
5

Year Published

2011
2011
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 244 publications
(112 citation statements)
references
References 248 publications
(573 reference statements)
1
103
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…In the first, a simple 2D model with a kinematically prescribed slab and a constant subduction rate (Table 1) is used. The advantage of a simple model is the limited parameter space, which allows the investigation of the "metamorphic density" in a systematic manner (Gerya, 2011). Therefore, we calculate the thermal structure down to a depth of 670 km (with a vertical resolution of 1000 m) to generate a steady state subduction zone.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the first, a simple 2D model with a kinematically prescribed slab and a constant subduction rate (Table 1) is used. The advantage of a simple model is the limited parameter space, which allows the investigation of the "metamorphic density" in a systematic manner (Gerya, 2011). Therefore, we calculate the thermal structure down to a depth of 670 km (with a vertical resolution of 1000 m) to generate a steady state subduction zone.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, the effect of the arc crust (Davidson, 1996;Davidson et al, 2005;Davidson et al, 2007;Kimura and Yoshida, 2006;Turner and Langmuir, 2015a) is not considered and will be discussed in a separate paper. Moreover, the serpentine mantle diapir model (Gerya, 2011;Gerya and Yuen, 2003;Marschall and Schumacher, 2012) is not considered because it does not effectively explain systematic across-arc geochemical variations found in many subduction systems Turner et al, 1997). However, the roles of melt diapirs formed by slab melting Tsuchiya and Kanisawa, 1994) are discussed because some felsic to intermediate arc magmas (e.g., adakite and high-Mg andesite) are thought to be the products of slab melts that subsequently interacted with the overriding wedge mantle Li et al, 2013;Martin, 1999;Moyen, 2009;Tatsumi and Hanyu, 2003).…”
Section: Mantle Wedgementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Water penetrating the mantle wedge lowers the mantle viscosity (van Keken et al, 2002) and solidus temperature (Green et al, 2014;Grove et al, 2006). The geodynamic responses are changes in the mantle-wedge flow due to the water-bearing mantle rheology (van Keken et al, 2002;Wilson et al, 2014) and the emergence of Rayleigh-Taylor instability by the formation of buoyant serpentinized mantle at the bottom of the mantle wedge (Gerya, 2011;Gerya and Yuen, 2003). Residual water in the slab and mantle returns to the deep Earth beyond the subduction zones (Hacker, 2008;Iwamori, 2000;van Keken et al, 2011), which can also affect the entire mantle convection process (Karato, 2010) and therefore the Earth's thermochemical evolution (Hirschmann, 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the past decades, numerical modelling of lithosphere subduction has advanced considerably by incorporating coupling between plates, between plates and mantle, and by incorporating the complexity of detailed subduction zone processes (see Gerya, 2011, for a review and references therein). Up to now modelling of regional subduction evolution is still being performed within spatially bound modelling domains in 2-D or 3-D (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%