2017
DOI: 10.1007/s00535-017-1382-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fusobacterium nucleatum as a prognostic marker of colorectal cancer in a Japanese population

Abstract: These results suggest that determining F. nucleatum levels may help predict clinical outcomes in colorectal cancer patients. Further confirmatory studies using independent datasets are required to confirm our findings.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
110
2
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 118 publications
(117 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
3
110
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Fusobacterium nucleatum numbers are significantly correlated with tumor size, and shortened survival times in a population of human Japanese patients with later stage CRC compared to earlier stages 53. These findings, as well as additional observations in rodent models and humans with CRC suggest that chronic inflammatory disease of the GI tract is a potential risk factor for the development of additional channels for amplified inflammatory processes, aneuploidy, high‐grade dysplasia, metaplasia and loss of cellular proliferative checkpoints, all of which are processes that can be appreciated in malignancy 13, 19, 54, 58, 59.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Fusobacterium nucleatum numbers are significantly correlated with tumor size, and shortened survival times in a population of human Japanese patients with later stage CRC compared to earlier stages 53. These findings, as well as additional observations in rodent models and humans with CRC suggest that chronic inflammatory disease of the GI tract is a potential risk factor for the development of additional channels for amplified inflammatory processes, aneuploidy, high‐grade dysplasia, metaplasia and loss of cellular proliferative checkpoints, all of which are processes that can be appreciated in malignancy 13, 19, 54, 58, 59.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This probe array was selected to identify specific bacterial groups and individual bacterial species previously shown to be relevant in the pathogenesis of intestinal cancers in humans, rodents, and dogs. 9,14,19,22,23,27,[35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48][49][50][51][52][53][54] Tissue sections were bathed in 30μL of DNA-probe-hybridization buffer mix in a hybridization chamber maintained at 54 C overnight (12 hours). Buffer 1 (20mM Tris, 0.9M NaCl, 0.1% SDS, 20% Formamide, 10% Dextran sulfate) was used for the hybridization of Eub338, Erec482, Bacto1080, Fuso0664, Ebac1790 and Faecali698.…”
Section: Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization (Fish)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been reported that the accumulation of F. nucleatum in colorectal tumor is partly due to fusobacterial lectin Fap2 and FadA adhesin and that F. nucleatum can induce the carcinogenesis and development of colorectal tumor by the microRNA‐21‐mediated pathway or inhibition of host adaptive immunity, etc Recently, our group also found that F. nucleatum promoted chemoresistance by modulating autophagy in CRC . F. nucleatum was reported to be associated with the prognosis of CRC as well . There also have been some studies exploring diagnosing colorectal tumor with F. nucleatum from tumor tissues or feces.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most commonly used test method for F.nucleatum was quantitative polymerase chain reaction(qPCR), 8,[12][13][14][15][18][19][20][21] besides, three studies 9,11,16 used the 16S ribosomal RNA(16sRNA) and Yuko Yamaoka used droplet digital PCR. 17 All patients described in the retrieved articles were divided into two groups based on high or low expression of F.nucleatum DNA.…”
Section: Flow Diagram Of the Studies Retrieved For The Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this analysis, F.nucleatum enrichment was signi cantly associated with poor CSS (HR = 1.93, 95% CI: 1.42-2.62 P < 0.0001) through the application of the xed-effects model, with low heterogeneity (I 2 = 0%, P = 0.69). ( Table 2, data from eleven articles 8,[11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19]21 for a total of 3413 patients were selected for analysis of the association between the abundance of F.nucleatum and primary tumor site in a randomeffects model (I 2 = 60%, P = 0.005). The result suggested that there is no signi cance evidence proving the correlation between F.nucleatum infection and tumor site (OR = 1.26, 95% CI: 0.91-1.75, P = 0.17) ( supplemental Fig.…”
Section: Association Between Fnucleatum Abundance and Prognosis Of Cmentioning
confidence: 99%