2010
DOI: 10.1097/brs.0b013e3181c4baf5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fusion Rates and Subsidence of Morselized Local Bone Grafted in Titanium Cages in Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion Using Quantitative Three-Dimensional Computed Tomography Scans

Abstract: The ratio of fused area of local bone inside cages at regions exposed to endplates was <50%, which is insufficient for physiologic load transmission. The authors recommend that additional bone should be grafted into the disc space or new bone bonding interbody spacer should be considered.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
52
0
2

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
52
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Lee et al [26] showed an overall fusion rate of 90.0 % with local bone graft in PEEK cages, and of 96.2 % with local bone graft in titanium cages [28], both assessed by CT 1 year after surgery. However, the fused area of local bone inside the cages at regions exposed to endplates was only 58.5 % for PEEK cages and less than 50 % for titanium cages.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lee et al [26] showed an overall fusion rate of 90.0 % with local bone graft in PEEK cages, and of 96.2 % with local bone graft in titanium cages [28], both assessed by CT 1 year after surgery. However, the fused area of local bone inside the cages at regions exposed to endplates was only 58.5 % for PEEK cages and less than 50 % for titanium cages.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Weiner et al [26] in their Brantigan ALIF cage series reported 50 %, while Butler [24] reported 10 % in ALIF with a pair of threaded cages, and Lee et al [16], in a study on 54 patients with supplemented posterior lumbar interbody fusion, reported 22 and 28 % subsidence rates in sagittal and coronal planes, respectively.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Beutler et al [24] defined subsidence as a height loss of greater than 2 mm. Lee et al [16] measured the ''endplate destruction length'' on CT in coronal and sagittal planes, which is definitely the most accurate measurement technique published to date.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, these studies did not clarify the amount of graft material acquired by decompression, although it is one of major factor of successful fusion [15]. There is also a report emphasizing the volume of graft based on the finding that clinical result can be unsatisfactory despite solid radiologic fusion ascribing it to insufficient area of bone bridge for effective load transmission between fused segment [23]. With this point of view, the quality of fusion in PLIF is different according to the quantity of bony bridge between endplates, or fused area ratio, as it is important in the aspect of load transfer and it could be one of factors explaining the well-known mismatch of fusion rate and clinical outcome in PLIF.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%