1974
DOI: 10.1016/0375-9474(74)90292-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fusion of heavy nuclei in a classical model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

12
257
1

Year Published

2003
2003
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 605 publications
(270 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
12
257
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The angular momentum conservation is explicitly taken into account at each step. In this code the input fusion cross section was calculated using the Bass formula [14]. The details of this model are given in our earlier work [1].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The angular momentum conservation is explicitly taken into account at each step. In this code the input fusion cross section was calculated using the Bass formula [14]. The details of this model are given in our earlier work [1].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We assume that evaporation always selects the "cheaper" species (i.e., protons if C p < C n , neutrons otherwise). In the following, C is calculated from tabulated nucleon separation energies [18] and the Bass prescription [19,20] for the Coulomb barrier. Under this assumption, removal of the "expensive" nuclear species (e.g., protons from 132 Sn and neutrons from 104 Sn) can never occur by evaporation; therefore, it must take place during the cascade stage, and little excitation energy must be available at the beginning of evaporation, otherwise, the competing nuclear species will be evaporated.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are several models that are developed to describe the nuclear potential between two nuclei. The barrier heights for 40 [23], and Sao Paulo [24] models are shown in Fig. 4.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%