2013
DOI: 10.1103/physrevc.88.041602
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaporation-cost dependence in heavy-ion fragmentation

Abstract: Inclusive multineutron and multiproton removal cross sections from 112 Sn and 104 Sn at relativistic energies have been measured. The data show two distinct regimes of the reaction process that depend on the nucleon evaporation cost of the final nucleus. This behavior is universal by regarding the mass or asymmetry of the initial system or target composition. A state-of-the-art cascade and deexcitation model reproduces the observed trend but systematically fails in reproducing cross sections for the removal of… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
20
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
2
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Because large excitation energies can be realized in numerous ways, some averaging takes place and the predictions become less sensitive to the details of the initial conditions. At the same time, it should be stressed that discrepancies do seem to increase for the removal of, e.g., several protons from stable nuclei [4]. This is consistent, inasmuch as the constraints on the excitation energy in that case are even stricter than for one-proton removal, as evidenced by the smallness of the associated cross sections.…”
Section: One-nucleon Removalsupporting
confidence: 49%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Because large excitation energies can be realized in numerous ways, some averaging takes place and the predictions become less sensitive to the details of the initial conditions. At the same time, it should be stressed that discrepancies do seem to increase for the removal of, e.g., several protons from stable nuclei [4]. This is consistent, inasmuch as the constraints on the excitation energy in that case are even stricter than for one-proton removal, as evidenced by the smallness of the associated cross sections.…”
Section: One-nucleon Removalsupporting
confidence: 49%
“…However, it was realized some time ago that these models systematically fail to describe inclusive cross sections for the removals of few nucleons, for example, [3,4]. This is especially surprising in view of the fact that these observables are associated with peripheral reactions and mostly involve collisions between quasifree nucleons; one would therefore expect the intranuclear cascade to provide an accurate description of this particular dynamics.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[9]); see also the work described in Ref. [10], which is particularly relevant to our subject because it was performed with a preliminary version of the model described in the present paper.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some invalidity of INC approach for the one-and multi-nucleon removal reactions was discussed in Ref. [48,49]. On the other hand, significant core excitation in low-lying excited states has been described within the Faddeev-AGS quantum scattering framework [50].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%