2023
DOI: 10.1155/2023/2599161
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fused Weighted Federated Deep Extreme Machine Learning Based on Intelligent Lung Cancer Disease Prediction Model for Healthcare 5.0

Abstract: In the era of advancement in information technology and the smart healthcare industry 5.0, the diagnosis of human diseases is still a challenging task. The accurate prediction of human diseases, especially deadly cancer diseases in the smart healthcare industry 5.0, is of utmost importance for human wellbeing. In recent years, the global Internet of Medical Things (IoMT) industry has evolved at a dizzying pace, from a small wristwatch to a big aircraft. With this advancement in the healthcare industry, there a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Then, a range of evaluation metrics are calculated, include accuracy, miss-classification rate, sensitivity, specificity, precision, False positive (FP) rate, False discovery rate, False omission rate, Positive likelihood ratio, Negative likelihood ratio, Prevalence threshold, critical success index, F1 Score, Mathews Correlation coefficient, Fowlkes-Mallows Index, informedness, and Diagnostic odds ratio. The following equations illustrate the equations used to calculate each of these metrics, providing a clear understanding of the underlying mathematical formulas for the statistical measurements [17][18][19][20][21][22][23]. The utilization of this diverse set of metrics ensures a comprehensive assessment of the models' performance, accounting for different aspects of predictive accuracy and error rates.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then, a range of evaluation metrics are calculated, include accuracy, miss-classification rate, sensitivity, specificity, precision, False positive (FP) rate, False discovery rate, False omission rate, Positive likelihood ratio, Negative likelihood ratio, Prevalence threshold, critical success index, F1 Score, Mathews Correlation coefficient, Fowlkes-Mallows Index, informedness, and Diagnostic odds ratio. The following equations illustrate the equations used to calculate each of these metrics, providing a clear understanding of the underlying mathematical formulas for the statistical measurements [17][18][19][20][21][22][23]. The utilization of this diverse set of metrics ensures a comprehensive assessment of the models' performance, accounting for different aspects of predictive accuracy and error rates.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The entire training and testing process was carried out using MATLAB 2020 with a Mac Book Pro 2017 Core i5 version with 16GB RAM, and the detection process took only 0.198 seconds. To verify the authenticity of the results, the proposed model uses statistical performance parameters [43][44][45][46][47][48][49][50][51][52]. In the proposed model obtained results ç represents true positive results, € represents true negative results, ∂ represents false-positive results, and § represents false-negative results.…”
Section: Stop 5 Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The blue group formed by four authors has a similar impact compared with the previous group, but much less than the first one. They mainly approached the medicine domain, looking for ML tools to predict lung cancer disease [53,54]. The last two groups contain two authors for each group, with a very small impact: discovering technologies and operations in Industry 4.0, proposing a framework for logistic management, and material characterization using Industry 5.0 [55][56][57][58].…”
Section: Authors' Explanationmentioning
confidence: 99%