“…Future studies will reveal, whether A. alternaria indeed behaves saprophytic on raspberry canes or if some pathovars are capable of infecting raspberry canes and, thus, contribute to cane diseases. On the other hand, F. avenaceum has been shown to be the main pathogen causing cane disease in northern Germany, which is thought to occur either independently or in combination with the cane midge R. theobaldi (Weber and Entrop 2008). The high proportion of F. avenaceum found on diseased raspberry canes, especially in August and October in the present study, suggests that the observation of Weber and Entrop (2008) may hold true for eastern Germany as well.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 48%
“…The infection may be associated with ''midge blight'' caused by the cane midge Resseliella theobaldi. However, this might not necessarily be the case (Williamson and Hargreaves 1979;Weber and Entrop 2008). Hence, we will generalize the disease complex as 'cane disease' throughout this manuscript without further specification.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This includes the identification of the primary causal pathogens in different areas in Germany. Until now, only northern Germany has been assessed (Weber and Entrop 2008). Moreover, artificial inoculation experiments for evaluating the resistance or susceptibility of germplasm have not been established.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This phenomenon is the result of multiple factors, including high production costs, increased labor costs and an increase in the occurrence of several plant diseases, including black root rot, the spread of fungicide-resistant Botrytis strains and cane diseases (Graham et al 2011;Rupp et al 2016). Raspberry cane disease is caused by various phytopathogenic fungi, including Fusarium avenaceum (Fusarium wilt), Didymella applanata (spur blight), Leptosphaeria coniothyrium (cane blight) and Botrytis cinerea (cane Botrytis) with F. avenaceum being the major cause of cane diseases in Northern Germany (Williamson and Hargreaves 1979;Weber and Entrop 2008). First pink to orange colored spore bearing structures on dark brown lesions which are clear indications of infections of young raspberry primocanes with F. avenaceum can be found at the end of May beginning of June at earliest depending on the year and weather conditions (Weber and Entrop 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Raspberry cane disease is caused by various phytopathogenic fungi, including Fusarium avenaceum (Fusarium wilt), Didymella applanata (spur blight), Leptosphaeria coniothyrium (cane blight) and Botrytis cinerea (cane Botrytis) with F. avenaceum being the major cause of cane diseases in Northern Germany (Williamson and Hargreaves 1979;Weber and Entrop 2008). First pink to orange colored spore bearing structures on dark brown lesions which are clear indications of infections of young raspberry primocanes with F. avenaceum can be found at the end of May beginning of June at earliest depending on the year and weather conditions (Weber and Entrop 2008). Afterwards disease symptoms are progressing until the end of August, beginning of September.…”
Raspberry cane disease, caused by a complex of fungi, is amongst the most devastating problems for raspberry production. Using resistant or highly tolerant genotypes is a promising strategy. However, until now, cultivars with good field resistance for German fruit growers as well as the primary causal pathogens of cane disease present in the eastern part of Germany, Saxony state are still unknown. The primary objective of this study was to identify the primary disease causing organisms and resistant Rubus germplasm for future breeding efforts. From 2012 to 2014, we evaluated the degree of susceptibility to cane diseases on 213 raspberry cultivars at two different locations using a rating scale. We also identified the main fungi growing on infected canes. Our results suggest that Fusarium avenaceum is the main fungus causing cane disease in Saxony. The Rubus hybrid cultivars 'Tayberry' (2n = 6x = 42), 'Buckingham Tayberry' (2n = 6x = 42) and 'Dorman Red' (2n = 2x = 14) displayed the highest levels of field resistance at both locations. Moreover, we established an in vitro assay for resistance evaluation which correlates significantly with field data and is particularly suitable for quick assessment of resistance against F. avenaceum in breeding material. Future breeding programs, aiming at cultivars with enhanced resistance towards cane diseases can use the presented data for parental selection and may employ our in vitro F. avenaceum inoculation method for parental testing and progeny selection.
“…Future studies will reveal, whether A. alternaria indeed behaves saprophytic on raspberry canes or if some pathovars are capable of infecting raspberry canes and, thus, contribute to cane diseases. On the other hand, F. avenaceum has been shown to be the main pathogen causing cane disease in northern Germany, which is thought to occur either independently or in combination with the cane midge R. theobaldi (Weber and Entrop 2008). The high proportion of F. avenaceum found on diseased raspberry canes, especially in August and October in the present study, suggests that the observation of Weber and Entrop (2008) may hold true for eastern Germany as well.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 48%
“…The infection may be associated with ''midge blight'' caused by the cane midge Resseliella theobaldi. However, this might not necessarily be the case (Williamson and Hargreaves 1979;Weber and Entrop 2008). Hence, we will generalize the disease complex as 'cane disease' throughout this manuscript without further specification.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This includes the identification of the primary causal pathogens in different areas in Germany. Until now, only northern Germany has been assessed (Weber and Entrop 2008). Moreover, artificial inoculation experiments for evaluating the resistance or susceptibility of germplasm have not been established.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This phenomenon is the result of multiple factors, including high production costs, increased labor costs and an increase in the occurrence of several plant diseases, including black root rot, the spread of fungicide-resistant Botrytis strains and cane diseases (Graham et al 2011;Rupp et al 2016). Raspberry cane disease is caused by various phytopathogenic fungi, including Fusarium avenaceum (Fusarium wilt), Didymella applanata (spur blight), Leptosphaeria coniothyrium (cane blight) and Botrytis cinerea (cane Botrytis) with F. avenaceum being the major cause of cane diseases in Northern Germany (Williamson and Hargreaves 1979;Weber and Entrop 2008). First pink to orange colored spore bearing structures on dark brown lesions which are clear indications of infections of young raspberry primocanes with F. avenaceum can be found at the end of May beginning of June at earliest depending on the year and weather conditions (Weber and Entrop 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Raspberry cane disease is caused by various phytopathogenic fungi, including Fusarium avenaceum (Fusarium wilt), Didymella applanata (spur blight), Leptosphaeria coniothyrium (cane blight) and Botrytis cinerea (cane Botrytis) with F. avenaceum being the major cause of cane diseases in Northern Germany (Williamson and Hargreaves 1979;Weber and Entrop 2008). First pink to orange colored spore bearing structures on dark brown lesions which are clear indications of infections of young raspberry primocanes with F. avenaceum can be found at the end of May beginning of June at earliest depending on the year and weather conditions (Weber and Entrop 2008). Afterwards disease symptoms are progressing until the end of August, beginning of September.…”
Raspberry cane disease, caused by a complex of fungi, is amongst the most devastating problems for raspberry production. Using resistant or highly tolerant genotypes is a promising strategy. However, until now, cultivars with good field resistance for German fruit growers as well as the primary causal pathogens of cane disease present in the eastern part of Germany, Saxony state are still unknown. The primary objective of this study was to identify the primary disease causing organisms and resistant Rubus germplasm for future breeding efforts. From 2012 to 2014, we evaluated the degree of susceptibility to cane diseases on 213 raspberry cultivars at two different locations using a rating scale. We also identified the main fungi growing on infected canes. Our results suggest that Fusarium avenaceum is the main fungus causing cane disease in Saxony. The Rubus hybrid cultivars 'Tayberry' (2n = 6x = 42), 'Buckingham Tayberry' (2n = 6x = 42) and 'Dorman Red' (2n = 2x = 14) displayed the highest levels of field resistance at both locations. Moreover, we established an in vitro assay for resistance evaluation which correlates significantly with field data and is particularly suitable for quick assessment of resistance against F. avenaceum in breeding material. Future breeding programs, aiming at cultivars with enhanced resistance towards cane diseases can use the presented data for parental selection and may employ our in vitro F. avenaceum inoculation method for parental testing and progeny selection.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.