2018
DOI: 10.1007/s10722-018-0670-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of Rubus genetic resources on their resistance to cane disease

Abstract: Raspberry cane disease, caused by a complex of fungi, is amongst the most devastating problems for raspberry production. Using resistant or highly tolerant genotypes is a promising strategy. However, until now, cultivars with good field resistance for German fruit growers as well as the primary causal pathogens of cane disease present in the eastern part of Germany, Saxony state are still unknown. The primary objective of this study was to identify the primary disease causing organisms and resistant Rubus germ… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
(28 reference statements)
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, D. eres and N. parceramosa were found in association with cane blight disease and produced symptoms on artificially inoculated raspberry plants. The occurrence of different fungal species demonstrated the presence of a complex of fungi involved in the development of raspberry cane diseases as described by Girichev et al (2018). Thus, considering the difficulty to distinguish different pathogens from symptoms or based on morphological traits, it becomes necessary the use of molecular tools to provide a correct identification (Girichev et al 2018).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Moreover, D. eres and N. parceramosa were found in association with cane blight disease and produced symptoms on artificially inoculated raspberry plants. The occurrence of different fungal species demonstrated the presence of a complex of fungi involved in the development of raspberry cane diseases as described by Girichev et al (2018). Thus, considering the difficulty to distinguish different pathogens from symptoms or based on morphological traits, it becomes necessary the use of molecular tools to provide a correct identification (Girichev et al 2018).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Little information is known about the infectivity of ascospores, whilst conidia could be dispersed by splashing rains from early spring to late autumn and could enter through cane wounds causing infection and considerable losses in raspberry production (Dolan et al 2018). Girichev et al (2018) reported raspberry cane disease as caused by a complex of different phytopathogenic fungi. Moreover, several fungal species can survive as saprophytes on canes with a role in disease development (Girichev et al 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Future work could focus on further evaluation since many other raspberry cultivars (Girichev et al, 2018) have not been evaluated yet. Considering genetic diversity of Rubus genetic resources, the results obtained by Girichev et al (2017) indicate that genetic diversity in German raspberry germplasm is narrow.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Malus accessions and land races maintained in the US national germplasm repository are sources of diverse functional alleles that can be used to breed apple cultivars with enhanced and durable resistance (Byrne et al 2018). In fact, large-scale screening of germplasm repositories is a common strategy to identify valuable traits for use in breeding for many major crop species (Girichev et al 2018;Liang et al 2015;Vasudevan et al 2014). Conventional commercial apple production is driven mainly by desirable fruit quality traits including taste and shelf life, but development of new apple scab resistant, or tolerant, cultivars might allow reduction of disease management costs, fungicide resistance development, as well as reduce negative environmental and health impacts, and is especially critical for organic and low input production (Koutis et al 2018;Kellerhals et al 2004).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%