Further validation of the 5-item Perceived Efficacy in Patient–Physician Interactions (PEPPI-5) scale in patients with osteoarthritis

Klooster, Peter M. ten; Oostveen, J. C. M.; Zandbelt, Linda C.; Taal, Erik; Drossaert, Constance H.C.; Harmsen, Etelka J.; Laar, Mart A F J van de

doi:10.1016/j.pec.2011.07.017

Cited by 92 publications

(93 citation statements)

References 41 publications

(58 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Patients can indicate on a 5-point Likert scale (1 = not at all confident to 5 = completely confident) how confident they are that they, for example, know which questions to ask or are able to make the most out of their care provider visit [24, 25]. …”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Efficacy, cost-utility and reach of an eHealth self-management application 'Oncokompas' that helps cancer survivors to obtain optimal supportive care: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial

Hout

Uden–Kraan

Witte

et al. 2017

Trials

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

BackgroundCancer survivors have to deal with a wide range of physical symptoms, psychological, social and existential concerns, and lifestyle issues related to cancer and its treatment. Therefore, it is essential that they have access to optimal supportive care services. The eHealth self-management application Oncokompas was developed to support cancer survivors with where they need to turn to for advice and guidance, as well as to increase their knowledge on the availability of optimal support. A randomised controlled trial will be conducted to assess the efficacy, cost-utility and reach of Oncokompas as an eHealth self-management application compared with care as usual among cancer survivors.Methods/designAdult cancer survivors diagnosed with breast, colorectal or head and neck cancer or lymphoma who are at 3 months to 5 years since curative treatment will be included. In total, 544 cancer survivors will be randomly assigned to the intervention group or a wait-list control group. The primary outcome measure is patient activation. Secondary outcome measures include self-efficacy, personal control, perceived patient-physician interaction, need for supportive care, mental adjustment to cancer and health-related quality of life. Furthermore, cost-utility outcomes will be assessed. Reach is defined as the percentage of cancer survivors who get access to Oncokompas within the context of this trial. Questionnaires will be administered at baseline, post-intervention and at 3- and 6-month follow-up.DiscussionIn this study, we will evaluate the efficacy and cost-utility of Oncokompas among cancer survivors, as well as the reach of Oncokompas. These are essential first steps in the translation of research into practice and contribute to sustainable adoption, implementation and maintenance of an evidence-based Oncokompas.Trial registrationNetherlands Trial Register identifier: NTR5774. Registered on 8 March 2016.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13063-017-1952-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

show abstract

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Efficacy, cost-utility and reach of an eHealth self-management application 'Oncokompas' that helps cancer survivors to obtain optimal supportive care: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial

Hout

Uden–Kraan

Witte

et al. 2017

Trials

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The Scores are summed and averaged [44,45]. Validation in a population of ambulatory osteoarthritis patients in the Netherlands demonstrated high internal consistency (α 0.92), fair test re-test reliability and high construct validity [44].…”

Section: Questionnairesmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Validation in a population of ambulatory osteoarthritis patients in the Netherlands demonstrated high internal consistency (α 0.92), fair test re-test reliability and high construct validity [44]. The PEPPI-5 has been used in the Netherlands to assess changes in patients' perceived confidence in their interaction with HCPs [46,47].…”

Section: Questionnairesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Use and effects of patient online access to medical records in general practice through a personal health record in the Netherlands. A protocol for a mixed methods study. (Preprint)

Vreugdenhil¹,

Kool²,

Boven³

et al. 2018

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…The confidence of patients in communicating with physicians can significantly affect the quality of the patient–physician relationship to a certain extent 10. Another study found that the Perceived Efficacy in Patient–Physician Interaction (PEPPI)-5 (the five item version of PEPPI) was strongly correlated with perceived health management skills, and moderately with social support and psychosocial aspects of health 11. Good patient–physician interaction has been shown to be associated with improved satisfaction with care and health outcomes 12…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The English PEPPI scale has two versions: a full ten-item scale and a simplified five-item scale, both of which have good reliability and validity (Cronbach’s α coefficient for PEPPI-10 is 0.91, respectively, Cronbach’s α coefficient for PEPPI-5 is 0.83 10. The English version of PEPPI-5 has been translated into Dutch, and its clinical feasibility has been verified 11. However, further studies are required to study the differences of this scale in assessing populations of different backgrounds, races, and beliefs.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Validation of the Chinese version 10-item Perceived Efficacy in Patient-Physician Interactions scale in patients with osteoarthritis

Zhao¹,

Luo²,

Maly³

et al. 2016

PPA

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

ObjectivesThis study aimed to assess the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the 10-item Perceived Efficacy in Patient–Physician Interaction (PEPPI-10) scale in hospitalized patients with severe knee osteoarthritis in the People’s Republic of China.MethodsBetween January and March 2015, the Chinese versions of PEPPI, self-efficacy for exercise scale, osteoporosis self-efficacy scale, and modified fall efficacy scale were applied to assess 110 severe knee osteoarthritis patients who were hospitalized in the second ward of the department of arthroplasty surgery of Tianjin Hospital.ResultsThe Chinese version of the PEPPI-10 scale had a high coefficient of internal consistency (Cronbach’s α coefficient, 0.907). The score of the Chinese version of PEPPI was weakly correlated with the scores of the Chinese versions of self-efficacy for exercise scale, osteoporosis self-efficacy scale, and modified fall efficacy scale.ConclusionThe Chinese version of the PEPPI-10 scale exhibits sufficient internal consistency and convergent validity in hospitalized patients with severe knee osteoarthritis in the People’s Republic of China.

show abstract

Further validation of the 5-item Perceived Efficacy in Patient–Physician Interactions (PEPPI-5) scale in patients with osteoarthritis

Cited by 92 publications

References 41 publications

Efficacy, cost-utility and reach of an eHealth self-management application 'Oncokompas' that helps cancer survivors to obtain optimal supportive care: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial

Efficacy, cost-utility and reach of an eHealth self-management application 'Oncokompas' that helps cancer survivors to obtain optimal supportive care: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial

Use and effects of patient online access to medical records in general practice through a personal health record in the Netherlands. A protocol for a mixed methods study. (Preprint)

Validation of the Chinese version 10-item Perceived Efficacy in Patient-Physician Interactions scale in patients with osteoarthritis

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About