2003
DOI: 10.1109/tcomm.2003.814211
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Further results on differential space-time modulations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, as the MSD decision rule in [12] is computationally too complex, only the special case of diagonal signals is considered in [12]. A general decision metric for MSD of DUSTM is derived in [14], which uses the Viterbi algorithm for detection, resulting in high complexity for large constellation size . In both [12] and [14], a major thrust is to analyze the error performance of these schemes, as opposed to developing efficient decoders.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, as the MSD decision rule in [12] is computationally too complex, only the special case of diagonal signals is considered in [12]. A general decision metric for MSD of DUSTM is derived in [14], which uses the Viterbi algorithm for detection, resulting in high complexity for large constellation size . In both [12] and [14], a major thrust is to analyze the error performance of these schemes, as opposed to developing efficient decoders.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A general decision metric for MSD of DUSTM is derived in [14], which uses the Viterbi algorithm for detection, resulting in high complexity for large constellation size . In both [12] and [14], a major thrust is to analyze the error performance of these schemes, as opposed to developing efficient decoders. The first important paper dealing with this decoding problem is by Clarkson et al [15], which develops a low-complexity approximate algorithm for the SSD of diagonal signals.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This can be explained by regarding MSDD as detection with inherent prediction-based channel estimation (cf. [40,32]), which yields estimation with lower estimation error for symbols located in the center positions of the observation window than for symbols at its edges.…”
Section: B Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When CSI is unavailable, OSTBC can be used in a differential encoding manner and still possess low decoding complexity [6]- [8]. Existing work on performance analysis of differential OSTBC can be found in [9]- [11], and they all assume identical channel distributions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%