2017
DOI: 10.1007/s10589-017-9900-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Further properties of the forward–backward envelope with applications to difference-of-convex programming

Abstract: In this paper, we further study the forward-backward envelope first introduced in [28] and [30] for problems whose objective is the sum of a proper closed convex function and a twice continuously differentiable possibly nonconvex function with Lipschitz continuous gradient. We derive sufficient conditions on the original problem for the corresponding forward-backward envelope to be a level-bounded and Kurdyka-Lojasiewicz function with an exponent of 1 2 ; these results are important for the efficient minimizat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
40
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
40
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nevertheless, under a local strong convexity and Lipschitz differentiability assumption onĥ, yet with no requirement on its domain, it is possible to locally identify the Bregman proximal mapping and its Moreau envelope with Euclidean objects, namely the forward-backward mapping and the corresponding FBE function [68,83]. This result complements what was first observed in [51], namely that the Euclidean FBE is, in fact, a Bregman-Moreau envelope. The advantage of this identification will be revealed in the next subsections, where local differentiability results will be deduced with virtually no effort based on already established results in the Euclidean setting.…”
Section: Fixed Pointsmentioning
confidence: 53%
“…Nevertheless, under a local strong convexity and Lipschitz differentiability assumption onĥ, yet with no requirement on its domain, it is possible to locally identify the Bregman proximal mapping and its Moreau envelope with Euclidean objects, namely the forward-backward mapping and the corresponding FBE function [68,83]. This result complements what was first observed in [51], namely that the Euclidean FBE is, in fact, a Bregman-Moreau envelope. The advantage of this identification will be revealed in the next subsections, where local differentiability results will be deduced with virtually no effort based on already established results in the Euclidean setting.…”
Section: Fixed Pointsmentioning
confidence: 53%
“…After analyzing the objective function (9) of DSCA, we can see that it is a difference combination of trace terms regarding A. Such a objective function may be nonconvex in practice [36], [37], since its Hessian matrix with regard to A is a difference combination of positive definite matrices and consequently may not be positive definite. Although its optimal solutions may be obtained via the generalized eigendecomposition algorithm, its optimality may be limited since it is solved in a conditionally-convex solution space spanned by a set of linear orthogonal eigenvectors (see (11)), whose optimality is dominated by the convexity of (9).…”
Section: B Convex Dsca (C-dsca)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is rooted to the sparse signal under tight frame and the constrained and unconstrained x 1 − α x 2 minimizations, which has recently attracted a lot of attention. The constrained x 1 − α x 2 minimization [18,28,33,36,37,52] is recovery of x. The unconstrained x 1 − α x 2 minimization [19,33,36,37,52] is…”
Section: Contributionsmentioning
confidence: 99%