2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0009-2541(03)00226-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Further investigations on optimized tail correction and high-precision measurement of uranium isotopic ratios using multi-collector ICP-MS

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
27
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
2
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nineteen replicate analyses of this standard yielded a mean d 234 U value of 36.42±0.80 (2s) that is in excellent agreement with previously published values (see review in Deschamps et al, 2003). For this specific study, the actual reproducibility on natural samples was determined by replicate measurements of an in-house carbonate standard, a powdered Bathonian limestone sample (HTM 02924 Mat #1) from the ANDRA HTM 102 borehole.…”
Section: Mc-icp-ms Analysessupporting
confidence: 84%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Nineteen replicate analyses of this standard yielded a mean d 234 U value of 36.42±0.80 (2s) that is in excellent agreement with previously published values (see review in Deschamps et al, 2003). For this specific study, the actual reproducibility on natural samples was determined by replicate measurements of an in-house carbonate standard, a powdered Bathonian limestone sample (HTM 02924 Mat #1) from the ANDRA HTM 102 borehole.…”
Section: Mc-icp-ms Analysessupporting
confidence: 84%
“…±1.3(2s, n=10). Analyses were performed on a Micromass IsoProbeMC-ICP-MS at the GEOTOP Research Center using the method described in Deschamps et al (2003). ( 234 U/ 238 U) activity ratios are calculated using the half-life values determined by Cheng et al (2000).…”
Section: Geological Setting and Samplingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The down-mass tails for all other isotopes were then scaled by their measured on-peak intensity and the sum of the downmass tails were subtracted from all on-peak measurements. The measured intensity at mass 237.04 was displaced above the power law fit through 237.54 and 236.54, likely due to an isobaric interference, as noted in a similar study by Deschamps et al (49)) and was therefore ignored. Up-mass tails were corrected using the mean slope and y-intercept of the CRM 112a analyses, measured under identical conditions.…”
Section: S42 Methods Configuration and Running Conditions: Mc-icpmsmentioning
confidence: 89%