2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2010.01.025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Further evidence of validity of the Gait Deviation Index

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
47
1
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
(23 reference statements)
3
47
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, the current results hold promise for the use of the GDI and GPS in both research and clinical practice. In contrast, other studies investigating the validity of gait summary measures showed differences in the GDI and GPS between GMFCS level I and GMFCS level II (10.28 and 2.38 for overall mean GDI and overall median GPS, respectively) [4,6]. The current SDC of 10.88 and 1.38 for the overall GDI and overall GPS, respectively, indicates that the GDI might only be useful at an individual level when significant progress above SDC is expected.…”
Section: Practical Relevance Of Our Resultsmentioning
confidence: 67%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Therefore, the current results hold promise for the use of the GDI and GPS in both research and clinical practice. In contrast, other studies investigating the validity of gait summary measures showed differences in the GDI and GPS between GMFCS level I and GMFCS level II (10.28 and 2.38 for overall mean GDI and overall median GPS, respectively) [4,6]. The current SDC of 10.88 and 1.38 for the overall GDI and overall GPS, respectively, indicates that the GDI might only be useful at an individual level when significant progress above SDC is expected.…”
Section: Practical Relevance Of Our Resultsmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…Studies of children with CP have shown that the GDI and GPS demonstrate satisfactory concurrent validity when compared with gold standard measures of gait and gross motor function [3][4][5][6]. They have also shown responsiveness to surgical lengthening of the gastrocnemius muscle [7,8], and the GDI has been reported as a reliable measure within a single session [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…a GDI of 65 is 3.5 SD away from the norm) as described by Schwartz and Rozumalski (Schwartz and Rozumalski 2008). Several studies have been published about the application of this index in order to quantify a patient's functional limitation during gait or the outcomes of specific treatments (Molloy et al 2010;Cimolin et al 2011). All the computed parameters were compared with the values of an age-matched control group (CG).…”
Section: Recording Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…GDI has been face and construct validated in children and adults with CP [21][22][23] while reliability studies was done in both CP and typically developed children [23]. GDI is based on the extraction of 15 gait features using the singular value decomposition from the 3DGA kinematics of the pelvis and hip in three planes, of the knee and ankle on the sagittal plane and of foot progression.…”
Section: Accepted Manuscriptmentioning
confidence: 99%