“…Although the running-based flavor aversion is weak in effect compared with poison-based flavor aversion, many behavioral features of Pavlovian conditioning have been demonstrated in this preparation as shown in Table 1 (see also Boakes & Nakajima, 2009, for an early review). All of the features shown in this table have been also demonstrated in poison-based FAL: law of contiguity despite long-delay learning (e.g., Garcia et al, 1966;Nachman, 1970), extinction and spontaneous recovery (e.g., Berman et al, 2003;Rosas & Bouton, 1996), CS-preexposure effect (e.g., Fenwick et al, 1975;Nagaishi & Nakajima, 2008), remote US-preexposure effect (see Riley & Simpson, 2000, for a review), proximal US-preexposure effect (see Best, 1982, for a review), degraded contingency effect (Monroe & Baker, 1979), inhibitory learning by backward conditioning (e.g., Green & Garcia, 1971;Hasegawa, 1981), stimulus overshadowing (e.g., Bond, 1983;Lindsey & Best, 1973), associative blocking (e.g., Gillan & Domjan, 1977;Revusky, 1977), and higher-order contextual control (e.g., Loy & López, 1999;Nakajima et al, 1995). Some of these have been reported in swimming-based FAL.…”