2011
DOI: 10.1177/0020872811406893
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Further discussion of indigenization in social work: A response to Gray and Coates

Abstract: This article responds to Gray's (2010) and Gray and Coates' (2010) responses to A Reflection on Indigenization Discourse in Social Work (Huang and Zhang, 2008), and presents further discussion of indigenization in social work. We indicate that it is an inherent professional requirement for social workers to use different ways to understand local contexts and to do locally relevant research and practice. We extend to address some points of indigenization from the Chinese perspective. The problems with the empha… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
(36 reference statements)
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Scholars have proposed that single components of one's identity, such as researcher's ethnic background or whether they are an 'insider' or 'outsider', in the research process are insufficient indicators of researcher's ability (Kjellgren 2003;Gray and Coates 2010;Yunong and Xiong 2012). Indeed, the idea of an 'insider' or 'outsider' can portray a false dichotomy, when researchers vary along multiple dimensions, including social background, prior experiences, politics, gender, and education (Chavez 2008;Gray and Coates 2010;Yunong and Xiong 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Scholars have proposed that single components of one's identity, such as researcher's ethnic background or whether they are an 'insider' or 'outsider', in the research process are insufficient indicators of researcher's ability (Kjellgren 2003;Gray and Coates 2010;Yunong and Xiong 2012). Indeed, the idea of an 'insider' or 'outsider' can portray a false dichotomy, when researchers vary along multiple dimensions, including social background, prior experiences, politics, gender, and education (Chavez 2008;Gray and Coates 2010;Yunong and Xiong 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, the idea of an 'insider' or 'outsider' can portray a false dichotomy, when researchers vary along multiple dimensions, including social background, prior experiences, politics, gender, and education (Chavez 2008;Gray and Coates 2010;Yunong and Xiong 2012). Each of these factors relate to the social distance between researchers and participants.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Culturally relevant social work research specific to, for example, ethnic minority groups, refugees, gender sensitivities, women's studies and mental health has yet to be organised . Here again, the necessity for social work practice research mirrors similar stages of professionalising social work in both the West and the East (Yunong & Xiong, 2012). …”
Section: The Development Of Social Work Educationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These four frameworks can be found within the works of Dominelli (2002), Garrett (2013), Howe (1987) and Payne (1996). It is important to recognise here, once again, the dominance of Western-based knowledge and the need for increased indigenous contributions within social work ontological frameworks, as is indicated within the new global definition and the continued debate on indigenisation (Feng, 2014;Ferguson, 2005;Gray, 2008;Gray & Coates, 2010;Tsang & Yan, 2001;Yan & Cheung, 2006;Yunong & Xiong, 2011). As much as these perspectives are identified as being key international theoretical frameworks for the social work profession, as reflected in the SAGE Handbook of International Social Work (Lyons, Hokenstad, Pawar, Huegler, & Hall, 2012), their use is not uncontroversial.…”
Section: Ontological Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%