2009
DOI: 10.1007/s00300-009-0645-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fur seals at Macquarie Island: post-sealing colonisation, trends in abundance and hybridisation of three species

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
19
0
2

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
4
19
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Differences in the timing of recolonisation by both sexes of A. gazella and A. tropicalis have most probably contributed to the high levels of hybridisation at Macquarie Island [19]. Subsequent establishment of breeding populations of both species has resulted in an overall decline in hybridisation, and neutral genetic markers indicate that both pure lineages are maintained in the population [18,20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Differences in the timing of recolonisation by both sexes of A. gazella and A. tropicalis have most probably contributed to the high levels of hybridisation at Macquarie Island [19]. Subsequent establishment of breeding populations of both species has resulted in an overall decline in hybridisation, and neutral genetic markers indicate that both pure lineages are maintained in the population [18,20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following the cessation of seal harvesting in the early 1900s, successful protection measures have enabled fur seal colonies to repopulate, resulting in the recovery of fur seal numbers at many rookeries across the Southern Ocean (Wilkinson and Bester, 1990;Goldsworthy et al, 2009;Waluda et al, 2010). For example, on Marion Island (46° 54' S, 37° 45' E) both Antarctic (Arctocephalus gazella) and sub-Antarctic (A. tropicalis) fur seal numbers have increased steadily between the mid-1990s and early twenty first century at mean rates of approximately 14.8% and 5.3% per annum respectively (Hofmeyr et al, 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hybrids among wild pinnipeds have been reported for Antarctic and subantarctic fur seals (Arctocephalus tropicalis) (Goldsworthy et al 1999), and harp and hooded seals (Cystophora cristata) (Kovacs et al 1997). Among the fur seals, hybridization rates were so high that they represented a risk to successful reestablishment of populations, but the frequency of crossing appears to be dropping as the numbers of animals recover, with site fidelity and somewhat different habitat preferences favoring breeding true, inducing declines in hybridization rates (Goldsworthy et al 2009;Lancaster et al 2010). Among cetaceans, fin (Balaenoptera physalus) and blue whale (B. musculus) crosses have been documented Spilliaert et al 1991;Berube and Aguilar, 1998), as well as hybrids between Dall's (Phocoenoides dallii) and harbor porpoises (Baird et al 1998;Willis et al 2004).…”
Section: Mitochondrial Dna (Mtdna) Analysismentioning
confidence: 96%