1981
DOI: 10.1088/0022-3735/14/9/002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fundamentals of junction measurements in the study of deep energy levels in semiconductors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

1985
1985
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 92 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We will now continue to discuss how the properties of these buried nanometer-sized Schottky contacts may be investigated, and in particular we will present the use of space-charge techniques 22 to obtain detailed information about the electron kinetics of buried metal features on a floating potential. We will now continue to discuss how the properties of these buried nanometer-sized Schottky contacts may be investigated, and in particular we will present the use of space-charge techniques 22 to obtain detailed information about the electron kinetics of buried metal features on a floating potential.…”
Section: Nanometer-sized Contactsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We will now continue to discuss how the properties of these buried nanometer-sized Schottky contacts may be investigated, and in particular we will present the use of space-charge techniques 22 to obtain detailed information about the electron kinetics of buried metal features on a floating potential. We will now continue to discuss how the properties of these buried nanometer-sized Schottky contacts may be investigated, and in particular we will present the use of space-charge techniques 22 to obtain detailed information about the electron kinetics of buried metal features on a floating potential.…”
Section: Nanometer-sized Contactsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The simplicity of the experiment is attractive compared to dual-source steady-state photocurrent methods that require multiple excitation sources and to transient photocurrent studies that determine the optical emission rate directly. 17 The method employed here is found to be robust against unusual photocurrent behavior that likely stems from the nonideal Schottky diode characteristics concomitant with deep dopants such as Mg in GaN. The theoretical basis for the present methodology is briefly reviewed, followed by an analysis of a͒ Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the interpretation of the diode admittance can be ambiguous when the dopant itself behaves as a deep level,8 as is the case for p-type ͑Al͒GaN:Mg. Spectral photocurrent has been applied to p-type GaN:Mg ͑Ref. 14͒ but is not able to distinguish majority and minority photoemission processes and thus cannot resolve deep level energies quantitatively 17. as a convenient and powerful method for quantitative investigation of deep levels in wide bandgap materials with deep dopants.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was pointed out that there is a considerable difference in the ionization energy and trapping cross section of some of the deep centers, according to the data obtained by different researchers. It was pointed out [6] that since the population of the deep levels in NDLS is completely defined by the charge carder emission processes when the barrier structure is switched from the equilibrium state into the depletion state, the results obtained by this method cannot give direct information on the parameters of the trapping processes. It was pointed out [6] that since the population of the deep levels in NDLS is completely defined by the charge carder emission processes when the barrier structure is switched from the equilibrium state into the depletion state, the results obtained by this method cannot give direct information on the parameters of the trapping processes.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%