2008
DOI: 10.4271/2008-01-1083
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fundamental Spray and Combustion Measurements of JP-8 at Diesel Conditions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
64
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 76 publications
(69 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
3
64
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The red symbol in Figure 5, points out the penetration result extracted from the processed contour of the image labeled as "a". With the LRT code, detected contours are biased towards shorter penetration measurements; while the texture code produces a more accurate contour, which results in a tip penetration evolution closer to typical measurements [13,17,19,20,26].…”
Section: Processing Routinesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The red symbol in Figure 5, points out the penetration result extracted from the processed contour of the image labeled as "a". With the LRT code, detected contours are biased towards shorter penetration measurements; while the texture code produces a more accurate contour, which results in a tip penetration evolution closer to typical measurements [13,17,19,20,26].…”
Section: Processing Routinesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, when looking into the described trends of reacting tip penetration compared to the inert one, results are somewhat non-consistent. By means of shadowgraphy, Picket et al in [19] have reported reacting spray results that penetrated slightly faster than the inert one. Moreover, the same author in [20] using the same optical setup but adding a schlieren cut-off (which are not used in shadowgraphy imaging) reported that the reacting spray progressed slightly more slowly than the inert case.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Different experimental results show that sometimes there is a clearly faster penetration, while in other cases differences between inert and reacting spray tip evolution are within the experimental uncertainty. Given the fact that different schlieren optical arrangements were used in previous investigations [18][19][20][21], a question can be raised as to how strong the influence of the setup on the results can be or, if this behavior is mainly dependent on the operating conditions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pickett and Hoogterp [20] investigated reactive spray penetration with schlieren imaging under moderate EGR conditions (15%O 2 ; 22.8 kg/m 3 ambient density and 900 K ambient temperature) for a 1.5ms injection event. Similar trends were observed during the autoignition and later penetration phases as reported by Siebers in [19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%