2019
DOI: 10.1109/tcomm.2019.2945292
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fundamental Limits of Spectrum Sharing for NOMA-Based Cooperative Relaying Under a Peak Interference Constraint

Abstract: Non-orthogonal multiple access (NOMA) and spectrum sharing (SS) are two emerging multiple access technologies for efficient spectrum utilization in future wireless communications standards. In this paper, we present the performance analysis of a NOMA-based cooperative relaying system (CRS) in an underlay spectrum sharing scenario, considering a peak interference constraint (PIC), where the peak interference inflicted by the secondary (unlicensed) network on the primary-user (licensed) receiver (PU-Rx) should b… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There are other existing literature on cooperative CR-NOMA networks [13]- [16]. For example, Kumar et al studied the sum rate and outage probability (OP) of an underlay relaying CR-NOMA [13], where they showed that the CR-NOMA system performs better than the CR-OMA one. A cognitive NOMA scheme where the strong user performs spectrum sensing was studied by Jia et al [14].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…There are other existing literature on cooperative CR-NOMA networks [13]- [16]. For example, Kumar et al studied the sum rate and outage probability (OP) of an underlay relaying CR-NOMA [13], where they showed that the CR-NOMA system performs better than the CR-OMA one. A cognitive NOMA scheme where the strong user performs spectrum sensing was studied by Jia et al [14].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, there is a need to investigate the influence of HIs and imperfect SIC on underlay CR-NOMA networks as they can degrade the system performance in terms of the OP, spectral efficiency (SE), ergodic capacity, etc. Accordingly, in contrast to [13], [25], [26], where no or only imperfect CSI was considered, this paper investigates the OP of a generalized and imperfect CR-NOMA, where nonideality is modeled by accounting for practical system limitations such as hardware impairments (HIs), CSI imperfections, and residual interference caused by error propagation during SIC. Moreover, different from [4], where the system was studied by neglecting the effect of the additive white Gaussian noise (AWGN), we study interference-and noise-limited CR-NOMA network with aforementioned system limitations.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our particular interest in this paper is the underlay mode of operation, where the secondary users are allowed to utilize the licensed spectrum with a strict constraint that the secondary users maintain the transmit power within a tolerable interference limit of the primary nodes. Good amount of literature on investigating the performance of CRNs is available (see [5]- [11] and the references therein). However, the security against jamming and eavesdropping attacks in CRNs is of prime concern, which occurs due to its highly adaptive nature and functionality in open wireless communication medium [12], [13].…”
Section: A Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Substituting the expression for f gw (x) (derived in Appendix B) into (9) and solving the integral similar to that in Appendix B, we obtain…”
Section: Case S-i: Statistical Il-csi and Instantaneousmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The superiority of NOMA in an underlay spectrum sharing scenario over its OMA-based counterpart, in terms of the average achievable rate, outage probability and ergodic sum secrecy rate, has been well-established in [9]- [11]. However, to the best of the authors' knowledge, the delay-constrained analysis of a spectrum sharing NOMA system has not yet been presented in the open literature.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%