2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0020-0255(03)00161-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fundamental frequency estimation of voice of patients with laryngeal disorders

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
11
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Name Citation fo/GCI URL N/A a nonlinear algorithm for epoch marking in speech signals using poincare maps Mann and McLaughlin (1998) fo N/A event-based instantaneous fundamental frequency estimation B. Yegnanarayana and K. Murty (2009) fo N/A harmonics frequency estimation based on instantaneous frequency Abe, Kobayashi, and Imai (1995) fo N/A hilbert envelope of linear prediction residual Guruprasad, B. Yegnanarayana, and K. Sri Rama Murty (2007) GCI N/A hidden Markov-model multipitch tracking algorithm Mingyang Wu, DeLiang Wang, and Brown (2003) fo N/A improved time domain pitch detection algorithm for pathological voice Jamludin et al (2012) fo N/A maximum likelihood harmonic matching and hidden Markov models Doval and Rodet (1993) fo N/A method to determine the instants of significant excitation using the average group delay characteristics of minimum phase signals Smits and B. Yegnanarayana (1995) GCI N/A multiband statistical learning Sha, Burgoyne, and Saul (2004) fo N/A optimum comb method Moorer (1974) fo N/A period histogram Schroeder (1968) fo N/A Poincaré sections for pitch mark determination Hagmüller and Kubin (2005) fo N/A real time harmonic pitch detector Seneff (1978) fo ID Name Citation fo/GCI URL N/A robust pitch determination using nonlinear state-space embedding Terez (2002) fo N/A spectral autocorrelation method Lahat, Niederjohn, and Krubsack (1987) fo N/A spectral equalization LPC method using Newton's transformation Atal, unpublished, cited in L. R. Rabiner and Crochiere (1976) fo N/A statistical pitch detection algorithm Y.-R. Wang, Wong, and Tsao (2002) fo N/A synthesis-based method for pitch extraction Paliwal and P. Rao (1983) fo N/A tunable IIR filter Lane (1990) fo N/A two-level autocorrelation method Mitev and Hadjitodorov (2003) fo (e)SRPD Super-Resolution Pitch Determinator Medan, Yair, and Chazan (1991) fo URL ACF-AMDF pitch detection Scheme based on ACF and AMDF Kumar, Bhattacharya, and Patel (2014) fo AGCD Approximate Greatest Common Devisor algorithm Sreenivas and P. V. S. Rao (1979) fo AMDF Average Magnitude Difference Function Ross et al (1974) fo ASDF Average Squared Difference Function…”
Section: Idmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Name Citation fo/GCI URL N/A a nonlinear algorithm for epoch marking in speech signals using poincare maps Mann and McLaughlin (1998) fo N/A event-based instantaneous fundamental frequency estimation B. Yegnanarayana and K. Murty (2009) fo N/A harmonics frequency estimation based on instantaneous frequency Abe, Kobayashi, and Imai (1995) fo N/A hilbert envelope of linear prediction residual Guruprasad, B. Yegnanarayana, and K. Sri Rama Murty (2007) GCI N/A hidden Markov-model multipitch tracking algorithm Mingyang Wu, DeLiang Wang, and Brown (2003) fo N/A improved time domain pitch detection algorithm for pathological voice Jamludin et al (2012) fo N/A maximum likelihood harmonic matching and hidden Markov models Doval and Rodet (1993) fo N/A method to determine the instants of significant excitation using the average group delay characteristics of minimum phase signals Smits and B. Yegnanarayana (1995) GCI N/A multiband statistical learning Sha, Burgoyne, and Saul (2004) fo N/A optimum comb method Moorer (1974) fo N/A period histogram Schroeder (1968) fo N/A Poincaré sections for pitch mark determination Hagmüller and Kubin (2005) fo N/A real time harmonic pitch detector Seneff (1978) fo ID Name Citation fo/GCI URL N/A robust pitch determination using nonlinear state-space embedding Terez (2002) fo N/A spectral autocorrelation method Lahat, Niederjohn, and Krubsack (1987) fo N/A spectral equalization LPC method using Newton's transformation Atal, unpublished, cited in L. R. Rabiner and Crochiere (1976) fo N/A statistical pitch detection algorithm Y.-R. Wang, Wong, and Tsao (2002) fo N/A synthesis-based method for pitch extraction Paliwal and P. Rao (1983) fo N/A tunable IIR filter Lane (1990) fo N/A two-level autocorrelation method Mitev and Hadjitodorov (2003) fo (e)SRPD Super-Resolution Pitch Determinator Medan, Yair, and Chazan (1991) fo URL ACF-AMDF pitch detection Scheme based on ACF and AMDF Kumar, Bhattacharya, and Patel (2014) fo AGCD Approximate Greatest Common Devisor algorithm Sreenivas and P. V. S. Rao (1979) fo AMDF Average Magnitude Difference Function Ross et al (1974) fo ASDF Average Squared Difference Function…”
Section: Idmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Qualquer tipo de lesão ou alteração nas pregas vocais provocará alterações na qualidade da voz. É por esse motivo que algumas pesquisas ressaltam a importância de se utilizar a análise acústica vocal como uma técnica não invasiva e capaz de fornecer suporte ao diagnóstico das disfunções laríngeas [9], [10], [11], [12].…”
unclassified
“…To analyse low-frequency vocal modulation, the phonatory frequency estimator must be able to track small frequency perturbations and handle disordered speech signals. Algorithms that estimate the phonatory frequency (Hess, 1983;Mitev and Hadjitodorov, 2003) fall into different categories, which involve the measurement of the length of each vocal cycle (Kadambe and Boudreaux-Bartels, 1992;Schoentgen, 2002), the estimation of the average period in an analysis frame (Medan et al, 1991;Boersma and Weenink, 2004), or the estimation of the instantaneous frequency of the fundamental spectral component of the speech signal (Winholtz and Ramig, 1992). The last category presents advantages when tracking small frequency perturbations: Firstly, the phonatory frequency must not be considered stationary over an analysis frame.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%