2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.physa.2022.127857
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fundamental diagram and stability of mixed traffic flow considering platoon size and intensity of connected automated vehicles

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…From Table (3), it can be seen that the mean free-flow speed of composition lies between 95% confidence interval, i.e. [34,28] km/hr. It can also be seen that ρ jam for C2 is higher than C1 as the T W and BLT proportion is higher for C2.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…From Table (3), it can be seen that the mean free-flow speed of composition lies between 95% confidence interval, i.e. [34,28] km/hr. It can also be seen that ρ jam for C2 is higher than C1 as the T W and BLT proportion is higher for C2.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Researchers have been exploring composite fundamental diagrams of human-driven vehicles (HVs) with different penetrations of connected autonomous vehicles (CAVs). Few studies follow average stable headway to estimate the composite fundamental diagrams where the combinations of CAVs and HVs were modeled probabilistically [34], [35]. Also, microsimulation-based IDM car-following models [36] were used to model the CAVs and HVs stream with different perceptions and reaction times for analyzing the properties of FDs in different composition levels [37].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Subsequent studies can consider how to determine the optimal merging positions and driving strategy for the CAV platoon [38,39]. (3) When the CAV merges, there is no obstacle in the acceleration lane.…”
Section: Data Availabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All vehicles are supposed to maintain the same driving behavior in most car-following traffic models, yet the actual situations are difficult to represent. In actual traffic scenarios, the car-following behaviors exhibit heterogeneity due to varying conditions of drivers or vehicles [ [28] , [29] , [30] , [31] , [32] , [33] , [34] , [35] , [36] , [37] , [38] ]. One of the most typical examples is that vehicles vary in size.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%