1995
DOI: 10.1109/49.400656
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fundamental bounds and approximations for ATM multiplexers with applications to video teleconferencing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

5
128
0
3

Year Published

2000
2000
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 197 publications
(136 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
5
128
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…However, in the same study, the authors observed that a simple DAR(1) model, based on a discrete-time, discrete state Markov Chain performs betterwith respect to queueing-than a simple AR(2) model. The results of this study are further verified by similar studies of videoconference traffic modelling and VBR video performance and simulation [6,12]. The above studies certainly constitute a valuable body of knowledge.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 67%
“…However, in the same study, the authors observed that a simple DAR(1) model, based on a discrete-time, discrete state Markov Chain performs betterwith respect to queueing-than a simple AR(2) model. The results of this study are further verified by similar studies of videoconference traffic modelling and VBR video performance and simulation [6,12]. The above studies certainly constitute a valuable body of knowledge.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 67%
“…However, in the same study, the authors observed that a simple DAR(1) model, based on a discrete-time, discrete state Markov Chain performs better-with respect to queueing-than a simple AR(2) model. e results of this study are further veri�ed by similar studies of videoconference traffic modelling [7] and VBR video performance and simulation [6,10]. In [11], Dr. Heyman proposed and evaluated the GBAR process, as an accurate and well-performed single-source videoconference traffic model.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…The training data set is used to construct the reference models, whereas the test data set contains the raw home load measurements that are used in the validation process. We use our reference models to compute the transformer size required to achieve a loss of load probability of 2.74 × 10 −4 , which is the standard used in industry, using teletraffic theory [7], as described in [2]. Then, using this same transformer size, we run a numerical simulation using the raw measurements as the input and compute the total duration of overload, which is a numerical estimate of the loss of load probability.…”
Section: Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%