2017
DOI: 10.28940/terra.v35i4.172
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fundamentação teórica dos sistemas de amostragem de solo de acordo com a variabilidade de características químicas.

Abstract: Devido à elevada variabilidade de determinadas características químicas, a amostragem de solo é uma das mais importantes fontes de erro em um programa de correção e adubação. O objetivo dessa revisão foi analisar criticamente os fundamentos teóricos que def inem os tipos de amostragem de solo utilizados para diferentes sistemas de cultivo, avaliando o grau de influência das variações de características químicas conferidas por cada situação. Confrontando informações dos trabalhos consultados, foi possível infer… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
3
0
5

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
3
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…The lower accuracy in the maps of the chemical attributes of the soil in relation to the physical ones (Figure 5) agrees with several studies about spatial variability carried out with chemical attributes of the soil using different sample sizes (from 9 to 164 samples) and sample densities (from 25x25 to 173x173), in different Brazilian states, therefore susceptible to different climates and soil types, and with other crops besides soy (corn and oats) (Cherubin et al 2014(Cherubin et al , 2015Kestring et al, 2015;Guarç oni et al, 2017). This is because the chemical attributes of the soil are more sensitive than the physical ones (therefore, than the SPR), concerning the description of spatial variability with a reduced number of samples (Jacob and Klutle, 1956).…”
Section: Analysis Of the Physical-chemical Attributes Of The Soilsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…The lower accuracy in the maps of the chemical attributes of the soil in relation to the physical ones (Figure 5) agrees with several studies about spatial variability carried out with chemical attributes of the soil using different sample sizes (from 9 to 164 samples) and sample densities (from 25x25 to 173x173), in different Brazilian states, therefore susceptible to different climates and soil types, and with other crops besides soy (corn and oats) (Cherubin et al 2014(Cherubin et al , 2015Kestring et al, 2015;Guarç oni et al, 2017). This is because the chemical attributes of the soil are more sensitive than the physical ones (therefore, than the SPR), concerning the description of spatial variability with a reduced number of samples (Jacob and Klutle, 1956).…”
Section: Analysis Of the Physical-chemical Attributes Of The Soilsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Tradicionalmente, a amostragem do solo é realizada adotando a divisão de glebas homogêneas de tamanho máximo preconizado por literatura, como 10 ou 20 ha (CANTARUTTI; ALVAREZ; RIBEIRO, 1999;IAC, 2020). Entretanto, a amostragem aleatória baseada na estatística "clássica" não é apropriada diante da ocorrência de dependência espacial (GUARÇONI; ALVAREZ, SOBREIRA, 2017). Nestas circunstâncias, recomendam-se técnicas geoestatísticas de interpolação para a estimativa de atributos do solo (SHAHRIARI et al, 2019;SULIEMAN;ALGARNI, 2019;LI;WAN;SHANG, 2020).…”
Section: Introductionunclassified
“…The chemical analysis is routinely done with composite soil sample, formed by the homogeneous mixture of several simple samples. Given the predominance of research aimed at the definition of the number of simple samples to form a composite (MACHADO et al, 2007;SANTOS et al, 2009;LIMA et al, 2010;SANTOS et al, 2013, GUARÇONI et al, 2017 it becomes relevant the dimensioning quantity of composite samples for the evaluation of soil fertility. The sample size is influenced by the purpose of sampling, precision required, method of selection and distribution of sample units, available resources and, above all, variation of the characteristic of interest (SHIVER; BORDERS, 1996).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is a widespread thought which states that random sampling is not appropriate for determining fertility, due to spatial dependence of soil chemical attributes (GUARÇONI et al, 2017). However, it should be pointed out that the random sampling itself, based on "classical" statistics, can generate independence between sample units when made actually at random, which would justify their use (SHIVER; BORDERS, 1996;GUARÇONI et al, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation