1994
DOI: 10.1016/1043-4666(94)90002-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Functionally distinct high and low molecular weight species of channel catfish and mouse IL-1

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
28
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2002
2002

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The comparison between the two experiments shows that the interrenal activa tion was not a requisite for the integumental effect observed, and also identifies the interrenal axis as a tar get of the bacterial product in tilapia. The fact that IL-1 treatment did not result in a similar activation might indicate the different mechanisms of action for in tegumental and endocrine effects of the cytokine prep aration, which likely differs from the tilapia homologue (Ellsaesser and Clem 1994).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The comparison between the two experiments shows that the interrenal activa tion was not a requisite for the integumental effect observed, and also identifies the interrenal axis as a tar get of the bacterial product in tilapia. The fact that IL-1 treatment did not result in a similar activation might indicate the different mechanisms of action for in tegumental and endocrine effects of the cytokine prep aration, which likely differs from the tilapia homologue (Ellsaesser and Clem 1994).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Whilst extreme caution should be used in interpreting results with the former, where non-cytokine factors in supernatants may influence the outcome, the latter approach does seem to have some merit. Some of the first work was carried out with IL-1 in channel catfish (Clem et al, 1991;Ellsaesser & Clem, 1994), and more recently in carp (Verburg van Kemenade et al, 1995). Interestingly, catfish leucocytes were unable to respond to recombinant IL-1 (rIL-1) in a mitogen-induced proliferation assay but could respond to a higher molecular weight form of native IL-1, thought to be an aggregate or polymer (Ellsaesser & Clem, 1994).…”
Section: Biological Cross-reactivitymentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Some of the first work was carried out with IL-1 in channel catfish (Clem et al, 1991;Ellsaesser & Clem, 1994), and more recently in carp (Verburg van Kemenade et al, 1995). Interestingly, catfish leucocytes were unable to respond to recombinant IL-1 (rIL-1) in a mitogen-induced proliferation assay but could respond to a higher molecular weight form of native IL-1, thought to be an aggregate or polymer (Ellsaesser & Clem, 1994). Responsiveness of fish leucocytes to rTNF has also been demonstrated (Hardie et al, 1994a;Jang et al, 1995b), although the e#ect generally required Table 2.…”
Section: Biological Cross-reactivitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations