“…Evidence of such variation in resource‐use strategies or trait syndromes has been found at the inter‐specific level across biomes and ecosystems (Díaz et al ., 2016; Bruelheide et al ., 2018; Rueda et al ., 2018). Other studies have, however, failed to find patterns of trait covariation consistent with a growth–survival trade‐off (Wright & Sutton‐Grier, 2012; Laforest‐Lapointe et al ., 2014; Vellend et al ., 2014; Mason & Donovan, 2015; Niinemets, 2015; Messier et al ., 2017; Galán Díaz et al ., 2021). Some possible biological and experimental reasons for the contrasting outcomes of empirical tests of the ‘worldwide ‘fast–slow’ plant economics spectrum’ are as follows: that different organizational levels (Anderegg et al ., 2018), life forms (Schulze et al ., 1998; Funk et al ., 2017) and leaf habits (Hikosaka et al ., 2021) show different trends in trait coordination; that trait coordination depends upon the studied environmental gradient (Anderegg et al ., 2021; Westerband et al ., 2021), and biome (Ramírez‐Valiente & Cavender‐Bares, 2017); and that different strategies found in natural populations are the result of both genetic and plastic variation (Gimeno et al ., 2009), which influence trait coordination in different ways and the assessment of which requires different experimental approaches.…”