2008
DOI: 10.1303/aez.2008.341
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Functional response of the lady beetle Harmonia axyridis (Pallas) (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae) on the aphid Myzus persicae (Sulzer) (Homoptera: Aphididae)

Abstract: The functional responses of each instar larva and adult of the coccinellid Harmonia axyridis to adults of the green peach aphid Myzus persicae were estimated under laboratory conditions. Linear parameter estimates from a logistic model of the proportion of M. persicae consumed by H. axyridis were negative at all development stages. Although a realistic estimate for the handling time of first instar larvae could not be produced, functional response curves of fitting the data with a random predator equation exhi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

4
19
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
4
19
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Both individual and paired H. axyridis exhibited type II functional responses, which was consistent with previous studies . Pairs of H. axyridis exhibited neutral interactions, indicating that intra‐specific interactions might not affect the control efficiency of H. axyridis .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Both individual and paired H. axyridis exhibited type II functional responses, which was consistent with previous studies . Pairs of H. axyridis exhibited neutral interactions, indicating that intra‐specific interactions might not affect the control efficiency of H. axyridis .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…As a consequence, the majority of empirical studies on predator–prey models have been conducted under laboratory conditions (e.g. Desurmont & Weston, 2008; Mahdian et al , 2008; Seko & Miura, 2008), where many aspects of the predator–prey interaction can be controlled. However, the results of such studies have often proved difficult to translate to field populations (Sih et al , 1998; Lester & Harmsen, 2002) due, among other factors, to the unavoidable simplifications of laboratory experiments.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Type III functional response are occasionally observed for some invertebrate predators (Hassell et al., ; Schenk & Bacher, ), especially under field conditions where particular factors can affect their behavior (Montoya et al., ). However, type II functional response is the most common response in invertebrate natural enemies (Fernández‐Arhex & Corley, ; Matadha et al., ; Monzó et al., ) including aphidophagous coccinellids (Koch, ; Seko & Miura, ; Xue et al., ; Farhadi et al., ; Jalali et al., ; Aqueel & Leather, ; Papanikolaou et al., ). For type II functional response, the predator–prey dynamics is unstable because the fraction of prey killed would decrease with the increase of prey density (Hassell, ; Abrams, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%