Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.bjps.2007.10.092
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Functional reconstruction of near total glossectomy defects using composite gastro omental-dynamic gracilis flaps

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We did not perform any type of dynamic tongue reanimation, nor did we make use of gastro‐omental free flap along with free gracilis muscle flap, although these have been reported to be suitable for achieving functional dynamic tongue reconstruction …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We did not perform any type of dynamic tongue reanimation, nor did we make use of gastro‐omental free flap along with free gracilis muscle flap, although these have been reported to be suitable for achieving functional dynamic tongue reconstruction …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This procedure although providing adequate glossopalatal contact and tongue movements, still does not achieve normal tongue appearance and has no intrinsic secretory capability. To circumvent this problem, in addition to the gracilis muscle flap, a free stomach flap, with mucosal surface intraorally, has been used as an added source of secretion for dry mouth with attached omentum providing adequate bulk [96]. …”
Section: Reconstruction Of Extensive Defectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The IGMF was first described by Yousif et al in 1999, emphasizing that active contraction of the muscle can elevate the posterior pharynx, miming the suction bump of the pharyngeal swallowing phase, and providing a sufficient bulk in addition to offering a reliable and easily accessible donor site . Moreover, Sharma et al highlighted three other major advantages of the gracilis muscle: it elevates the larynx, matches the correct tongue size, and can actively move in a coordinated way for swallowing and speech . To the best of our knowledge, the gracilis muscle shares an important characteristic with the tongue muscles (i.e., hyoglossus and genioglossus).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, in 1999 Lyos et al chose the rectus abdominis free flap (RAFF) for its exceptional abundance of tissue, 6 but with the sole purpose of filling the oral cavity and allowing glossopalatal contact. 13 However, the main aim of the techniques currently employed, such as the LDM flap, 4 RFFF, ALT flap, 5 and innervated RAFF, is to acquire some degree of active movement. 5 For this purpose, the motor innervation of the muscle of the neotongue must be restored with microsurgical anastomosis between the flap's nerve and the hypoglossal nerve.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation