2012
DOI: 10.1002/pmic.201100055
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Functional proteomics reveals hepatotoxicity and the molecular mechanisms of different forms of chromium delivered by skin administration

Abstract: Chromium compounds are known to be associated with cytotoxicity and carcinogenicity when applied via the skin. However, there is no perspective research to elucidate the causations between chromium exposure and hepatotoxicity. In the present study, the impact of hexavalent/trivalent chromium on the liver and the underlying pathogenic processes were revealed in the female nude mice model. The liver damage under different treatments was evaluated by histologic examination. Functional proteome tools combined with… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

1
24
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

4
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
1
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The statistical relevance of the ontological matches was calculated as the p ‐value, which is the probability of a match occurring by chance, given the size of the database. The p ‐value was calculated using the following formula: P value =[R!n!(NR)!(Nn)!]/N!i=max(r,R+nN)min(n,R)1/[i!(Ri)!(N0.16em0.16em Rn+i)!]; where N is the total number of nodes in the MetaCore database; R is the number of network objects corresponding to genes and proteins in the list; n is the total number of nodes in each small network generated from the list; and r is the number of nodes with data in each small network generated from the list .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The statistical relevance of the ontological matches was calculated as the p ‐value, which is the probability of a match occurring by chance, given the size of the database. The p ‐value was calculated using the following formula: P value =[R!n!(NR)!(Nn)!]/N!i=max(r,R+nN)min(n,R)1/[i!(Ri)!(N0.16em0.16em Rn+i)!]; where N is the total number of nodes in the MetaCore database; R is the number of network objects corresponding to genes and proteins in the list; n is the total number of nodes in each small network generated from the list; and r is the number of nodes with data in each small network generated from the list .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Protein spots were quantified using the Prodigy SameSpots software (Nonlinear Dynamics, Newcastle, UK). The expression levels of protein spots dysregulated by >1.5 fold with statistical significance ( p ‐value <0.05) between Tan IIA and control should be considered as proteins of interest . All experiments were biologically repeated three times to confirm the reproducibility.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sample slices were stained with hematoxylin-eosin (H/E) and Masson's trichrome (MT) for a histological assessment. Immunohistochemistry with α -SM-actin (at a 1 : 150 dilution in PBS; Neomarkers) was applied to specimens, as previously described [25, 26]. The histological changes were evaluated by using optical microscopy (Olympus BX51, Olympus Optical Co., Tokyo, Japan) in non consecutive, randomly chosen 200x or 400x histological fields.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each spot intensity volume (%) was processed by background subtraction and total spot volume normalization; the resulting spot volume percentage was used for comparison between groups. More than 2.0-fold alterations at 95% confidence interval ( P < 0.05) were considered as statistically significant [26]. All experiments were repeated 3 times from three independent experiments.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation