The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2004
DOI: 10.1191/0269215504cr716oa
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Functional outcome of patients with proximal upper limb deficiency–acquired and congenital

Abstract: As many as 33.75% of patients with proximal upper limb deficiency rejected their prostheses and many who continue to wear them do not find them useful in ADL and employment, etc. It is vital that rehabilitation programmes should focus on both prosthetic and nonprosthetic training to achieve maximal independence.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

9
143
6
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 170 publications
(159 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
9
143
6
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The largest incidence of upper extremity injuries is found in males in the 45-54 years age group. Amputations of the upper limb usually occur at a relatively young age and are mainly caused by trauma [6][7][8]. Therefore, individuals with an amputation of their upper limb are likely to live and work with the amputation for a long portion of their life [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The largest incidence of upper extremity injuries is found in males in the 45-54 years age group. Amputations of the upper limb usually occur at a relatively young age and are mainly caused by trauma [6][7][8]. Therefore, individuals with an amputation of their upper limb are likely to live and work with the amputation for a long portion of their life [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In individuals with upper limb absence (ULA), congenital or acquired, the prevalence of musculoskeletal complaints (MSCs) of their residual limb, non-affected limb, neck, or back ranges from 20% to 64%, depending on the location of MSCs [1,6,[9][10][11][12]. A prevalence of MSCs in the preceding year in individuals with major ULA (wrist disarticulation or more proximal amputation levels) of 65%, versus a year prevalence of 34% in the control group, was found recently [13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As such, they can potentially address both functional [3] and cosmetic [4] user needs and have positive psychosocial implications [5][6][7][8][9]. However, the actual impact of these technologies on patients' lives has been documented in only two case reports [10][11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1][2][3] Furthermore, lower limb amputees tend to be more satisfied with their occupational status than controls. 2 After an upper limb amputation, job reintegration is high, 4,5 but nothing has yet been revealed on job satisfaction after an upper limb amputation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%