2014
DOI: 10.1017/s0308210512001370
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Functional inequalities for modified Struve functions

Abstract: Abstract. In this paper, by using a general result on the monotonicity of quotients of power series, our aim is to prove some monotonicity and convexity results for the modified Struve functions. Moreover, as consequences of the above mentioned results, we present some functional inequalities as well as lower and upper bounds for modified Struve functions. Our main results complement and improve the results of Joshi and Nalwaya [11].

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

8
40
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
8
40
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this paper, we obtain new bounds for the ratios L ν (x)/L ν−1 (x) and L ν (x)/L ν (y), the condition numbers xL ′ ν (x)/L ν (x) and the modified Struve function L ν (x) itself. These results complement and, at least in some cases, improve those given in [8,22]. Our approach is quite different, though.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 86%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In this paper, we obtain new bounds for the ratios L ν (x)/L ν−1 (x) and L ν (x)/L ν (y), the condition numbers xL ′ ν (x)/L ν (x) and the modified Struve function L ν (x) itself. These results complement and, at least in some cases, improve those given in [8,22]. Our approach is quite different, though.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…where we have equality if and only if ν = 1 2 . It should also be noted that a more complicated bound, valid for ν ≥ 3 2 , which improves on (2.25) is given by inequality (3.1) of [8]. Let us compare our bound (2.23) with (2.25).…”
Section: )mentioning
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Setting µ = ν in (4.54) yields the upper boundL ν (x) < Γ(ν + 1) 3(2ν + 3) √ πΓ(ν + 3 xI ν (x) x 2 + 3(2ν + 3) , x > 0, ν > −1,(4.59)which complements the following inequality of[9]:L ν (x) ≤ 2Γ(ν + 2) √ πΓ(ν + 3 2 ) I ν+1 (x), x > 0, ν ≥ − 1 2 , (4.60)…”
mentioning
confidence: 80%
“…As already noted, the reason for this similarity is because many of the properties of I ν (x) that were exploited in the proofs of [8,10,13] are shared by L ν (x), which we now list. All these formulas can be found in [17], except for the inequality which is given in [2]. Further inequalities for L ν (x) can be found in [2,3,12,15], some of which improve on the inequality of [2].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%