2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmaa.2018.08.043
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bounds for modified Struve functions of the first kind and their ratios

Abstract: We obtain a simple two-sided inequality for the ratio L ν

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

4
24
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

3
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
4
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(Tables for the case µ = ν are given in [21].) In agreement with the above analysis, we see that, as a result of the exponential decay of b µ,ν (x), the bounds are very accurate for larger values of x, particularly for smaller values of µ, whilst both bounds improve for 'small' x as ν increases.…”
Section: Boundingsupporting
confidence: 82%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…(Tables for the case µ = ν are given in [21].) In agreement with the above analysis, we see that, as a result of the exponential decay of b µ,ν (x), the bounds are very accurate for larger values of x, particularly for smaller values of µ, whilst both bounds improve for 'small' x as ν increases.…”
Section: Boundingsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…We therefore progress the literature from having no bounds for the ratio t µ,ν (x)/t µ−1,ν−1 (x) to a wide variety, and we note some examples. As a special case of Theorem 3.4, we obtain the same two-sided inequality for the ratio L ν (x)/L ν−1 (x) that was obtained in Theorem 2.1 of [21], but with a larger range of validity for the lower bound. This arises from an alternative method of proof that avoids the use of integral representations of the functions L ν (x) and I ν (x) which were used to prove Theorem 2.1 of [21].…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 70%
See 3 more Smart Citations