2018
DOI: 10.1097/gox.0000000000001775
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Functional Improvement with Free Vascularized Toe-to-hand Proximal Interphalangeal (PIP) Joint Transfer

Abstract: Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, microsurgery is inherently demanding, and recent studies continue to demonstrate only 24 to 37° of average arc of motion following vascularized toe joint transfer. 1,23,24 In their meta-analysis, Chen et al 23 additionally found no difference in postoperative ROM between children and adults. A retrospective review by Ellis et al suggested postoperative arc of motion was further limited in preadolescent patients (12 years of age or younger), who averaged 24.3° of motion after vascularized toe to finger joint transfer.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, microsurgery is inherently demanding, and recent studies continue to demonstrate only 24 to 37° of average arc of motion following vascularized toe joint transfer. 1,23,24 In their meta-analysis, Chen et al 23 additionally found no difference in postoperative ROM between children and adults. A retrospective review by Ellis et al suggested postoperative arc of motion was further limited in preadolescent patients (12 years of age or younger), who averaged 24.3° of motion after vascularized toe to finger joint transfer.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In addition, results of vascularized joint transfer continued to experience many of the same functional issues exhibited by nonvascularized transfers such as suboptimal ROM (both extension lag and poor flexion) and diminished long-term growth. [20][21][22][23][24] No highlevel evidence exists that shows consistent growth after either nonvascularized or vascularized toe to finger joint transfer, and growth potential remains largely theoretical.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The transfer of a free vascularized graft from the second proximal interphalangeal joint of the foot remains an alternative for active patients, especially for young patients with open epiphyseal plates 22,23 . However, previous reports suggest that the donor site morbidity of the second proximal interphalangeal joint is significantly higher than the femoral condyle 15,16,23 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on our experience of free vascularized distal interphalangeal joint flap procedures, we conclude that distal interphalangeal joint flap is a safe and effective procedure for traumatic proximal interphalangeal joint defects without causing damage to the donor toes. This method is deemed superior to conventional proximal interphalangeal joint transfer since less trauma is caused to the donor site [1,[6][7][8][9][10][11].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Osteoarthritis-related defects of the finger joint can be repaired with temporary replacements, such as implants [1][2][3][4][5], permanent arthrodesis, and vascularized joint grafts like joint flaps or articular flaps [6][7][8][9][10][11]. Among these methods, the best one is believed to be the permanent substitution through an autogenous vascularized joint transfer utilizing the proximal interphalangeal joint of the second toe [6][7][8][9][10][11]. This procedure, however, has the disadvantage that the donor toe becomes deformed and shorter, which has the effect of reducing the range of motion.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%