Background Comfort and recovery are major concerns of patients seeking aesthetic surgery. This study aimed to assess postoperative pain and recovery after outpatient breast surgery under sedation, intercostal block, and local anaesthesia. Methods This prospective cohort study included all consecutive patients who underwent aesthetic breast surgery between April 2021 and August 2022. Epidemiological data, anaesthesia, pain, and patients’ satisfaction were systematically assessed with standardized self-assessment questionnaires. Results Altogether, 48 patients [median (IQR) age: 30 (36–25)] were included. The most frequent surgery was mastopexy. 69% of surgeries involved additional procedures. The mean intercostal block and local anaesthesia time was 15 min. Patients received a median (IQR) of 19 (34–2) mg/kg lidocaine and 2.3 (2.5–2.0) mg/kg ropivacaine. The median (IQR) consumption of propofol and alfentanil was, respectively, 4.89 (5.48–4.26) mg/kg/h and 0.27 (0.39–0.19) µg/kg/min. No conversion to general anaesthesia or unplanned hospital admission occurred. Patients were discharged after a median (IQR) of 2:40 (3:43–1:58) hours. Within the first 24 postoperative hours, 17% required once an antiemetic medication and 38% an opioid. Patients were very satisfied with the anaesthesia and 90% of the patients had not wished more analgesia in the first 24 h. Conclusions Aesthetic breast surgery under sedation, intercostal block, and tumescent anaesthesia can safely be performed as an ambulatory procedure and is associated with minimal intra- and postoperative opioid consumption and high patient satisfaction. These data may be used to inform patients and clinicians and improve the overall quality of care. Level of Evidence IV This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 . Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00266-022-03214-w.

Background: The medial femoral condyle has become a matter of great interest, thanks to the possibility of harvesting versatile chimeric flaps for reconstruction of metacarpal defects with minimal donor site morbidity. This case stands out because of the complete reconstruction of the metacarpal head, harvesting with a skin paddle for tension-free closure and monitoring, and the use of external fixation for better predictability of the reconstruction and early postoperative mobilization. Case Presentation: We report the case of a 20-year-old male patient who presented with an aneurysmal bone cyst involving the fourth metacarpal bone. The patient underwent resection en bloc of the metaphysis and distal epiphysis of the fourth metacarpal bone, and the bone defect was reconstructed using a 3.4-cm vascularized osteochondral cutaneous graft from the medial femoral condyle. Results: At 1-year follow-up, the patient showed no impairment in hand range of motion and had a Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder and Hand score inferior to that of the male healthy population. Almost 5 years after the procedure, the radiographic examination did not reveal signs of arthrosis. This case report shows that the medial femoral condyle is an excellent and versatile source of vascularized osteochondral grafts for reconstruction of metacarpal defects.

Background Patients’ expectations of an anticipated timeline of recovery and fear of anesthesia in aesthetic breast surgery have not been studied. Objective This study aims to assess patient anxiety, expectations, and satisfaction after Enhanced Recovery after Surgery (ERAS) pathways for aesthetic breast surgery and the progress of postoperative recovery. Materials and methods All consecutive patients who underwent aesthetic breast surgery between April 2021 and August 2022 were included in this single-center prospective cohort study. The ERAS protocol consists of more than 20 individual measures in the pre-, intra-, and postoperative period. Epidemiological data, expectations, and recovery were systematically assessed with standardized self-assessment questionnaires, including the International Pain Outcome Questionnaire (IPO), the BREAST-Q or BODY-Q, and data collection forms. Results In total, 48 patients with a median of 30 years of age were included. Patients returned to most daily activities within 5 days. Eighty-eight percent of patients were able to accomplish daily activities sooner than expected. The time of return to normal daily activities was similar across all procedure types. There was no statistically significant difference regarding postoperative satisfaction between patients who recovered slower (12%) and patients who recovered as fast or faster (88%) than anticipated (p=0.180). Patients reporting fear of anesthesia in the form of conscious sedation significantly diminished from 17 to 4% postoperatively (p<0.001). Conclusion Enhanced Recovery after Surgery (ERAS) pathways for aesthetic breast surgery are associated with rapid recovery and high patient satisfaction. This survey study provides valuable insight into patients’ concerns and perspectives that may be implemented in patient education and consultations to improve patient satisfaction following aesthetic treatments. Level of Evidence IV This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.

Background: Cheek contour is a main determinant of facial attractiveness. The aim of this study was to evaluate the relationship between age, sex, and body mass index (BMI) and cheek fat volume in a large cohort to better understand and treat facial aging. Methods: The authors performed a retrospective review of the archives of the Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital of Tübingen. Epidemiologic data and medical history were assessed. Cheek superficial and deep fat compartment volumes were measured on magnetic resonance images. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS and SAS statistical software. Results: A total of 87 patients with a mean age of 46 years (range, 18 to 81 years) were included. The superficial and deep fat compartment volumes of the cheek increased with BMI (P < 0.001 and P = 0.005), but there was no significant relationship between age and volume. The ratio of superficial versus deep fat did not change with age. No significant difference of the superficial or deep fat compartments was found between men and women in a regression analysis (P = 0.931 and P = 0.057). Conclusions: Cheek fat volume measurements on magnetic resonance imaging scans using reconstruction software suggest that the fat volume of the cheek increases with BMI but does not change significantly with age. Further studies are needed to elucidate the role of age-related changes of bone structures or sagging of the fat compartments.

Introduction: Surgical specialties are often involved in legal actions associated with inadequate or incomplete documentation. Case presentation: We report the case of a 22-year-old patient with gynecomastia who developed a unilateral hematoma after power-assisted liposuction and subcutaneous mastectomy performed in an outpatient setting under intercostal nerve block and monitored anaesthesia care. After revision surgery healing was uneventful. Further exams revealed a von Willebrand Disease. The patient had omitted a previous circumcision and the occurrence of a hematoma thereafter during the preoperative patient assessment. The specific and detailed anamnesis and the erroneous answer were documented on a structured self-assessment patient questionnaire for pre-surgical evaluation. Conclusion: Literature suggests that standardized risk assessment improves the quality of the anamnesis, the patients’ safety, the physician’s time management. This case illustrates that it may also help defend the surgeons in case of medical litigation. However, physicians need to be aware of the risk of response bias.Level of Evidence: Level V, case report