2011
DOI: 10.1186/1756-0500-4-462
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Functional Genomics Assistant (FUGA): a toolbox for the analysis of complex biological networks

Abstract: BackgroundCellular constituents such as proteins, DNA, and RNA form a complex web of interactions that regulate biochemical homeostasis and determine the dynamic cellular response to external stimuli. It follows that detailed understanding of these patterns is critical for the assessment of fundamental processes in cell biology and pathology. Representation and analysis of cellular constituents through network principles is a promising and popular analytical avenue towards a deeper understanding of molecular m… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Subsequently, gene clusters were enriched for over-represented Gene Ontology (GO) Biological Process (BP) terms [35] using the hypergeometric test. For a cluster with n genes and an a priori defined functional category with K genes, the hypergeometric test was used to evaluate the significance of overlap k between the cluster and GO-BP category [36], [37]. All N genes on a microarray were used as reference.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Subsequently, gene clusters were enriched for over-represented Gene Ontology (GO) Biological Process (BP) terms [35] using the hypergeometric test. For a cluster with n genes and an a priori defined functional category with K genes, the hypergeometric test was used to evaluate the significance of overlap k between the cluster and GO-BP category [36], [37]. All N genes on a microarray were used as reference.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Details of the microarray analyses and gene identification including normalization using Robust Multi-array Average (RMA) [18], identifying probes and mapping to Ensembl gene identifiers, assessment of gene co-expression network inferences, network partitioning and functional enrichment analyses [19] are included in the Supplemental methods. This computational approach ( Figure 1 , Figure S2 ) resulted in the identification of 75 candidate genes.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Principal component analyses and hierarchical clustering enable functional classification of the identified gene expression networks and even individual genes and related signalling pathways (249). By this approach putative target genes with prognostic or therapeutic potential can be identified as well as further interacting partners (250,251). These target genes don't necessarily have to be deregulated below or above a certain threshold (252), comparison to "normal" tissue or between different entities of malignant diseases defines central node-genes like transcription factors or cell cycle regulators (253).…”
Section: Biostatistical Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Computational visualisation of gene-geneinteraction networks and the related gene-clusters enables also a topological assessment of gene-coexpression as well as the integration of multiple datasets for a comprehensive analysis (251,260). The results are based on features of the ENSEMBL database and classified by "gene-ontology" terms: a) biological process, b) molecular function, c) cellular component (261).…”
Section: Biostatistical Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%