Abstract:In this article, we bring together conversation analysis and usage-based linguistics to investigate the second language (L2) developmental trajectory of a linguistic construction within the complex multimodal ecology of naturally occurring social interaction. We document how, over the course of 15 months, an L2 speaker's use of the French multiword expression comment on dit [how do you say] diversifies in both form and function. Two types of longitudinal change are observed: (a) The expression expands in its c… Show more
“…The studies reported here—in particular, those by Theodórsdóttir & Eskildsen (2022, this issue), Hellermann & Thorne (2022, this issue), and Pekarek Doehler & Skogmyr Marian (2022, this issue)—align with earlier work that stresses the value of rewilding language education (Thorne et al., 2021) in the form of pedagogical frameworks and infrastructures that center on L2 learners’ needs and experiences of language use outside the classroom. This addresses “the challenge of how to dynamically integrate formal learning settings with the vibrancy and diversity of linguistic, experiential, and situational contexts out in the world” (Hellermann & Thorne, 2022, this issue, p. 93).…”
Section: Implications For Language Educationsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…Second, similarly to Theodórsdóttir and Eskildsen's work, they point to the importance of examining how L2 usage patterns adjust to and develop in response to local interactional needs. This lends support to the argument that “grammatical routines may be motivated by social‐interactional exigencies” (Pekarek Doehler & Skogmyr Marian, 2022, this issue, p. 40; see also Couper–Kuhlen, 2011; Pekarek Doehler & Balaman, 2021). Importantly, the detailed qualitative analysis of the data reveals that the different uses of the multiword expression intertwine with precise embodied displays—in particular, recurrent gaze patterns.…”
Section: Respecifiying L2 Grammarsupporting
confidence: 58%
“…The study by Pekarek Doehler & Skogmyr Marian (2022, this issue) traces the developmental trajectory of the multiword construction comment on dit [how do you say] in French focusing on the interplay of linguistic, prosodic, and embodied resources in turn construction. The authors’ careful analysis of longitudinal data from one learner's interactions in L2 French conversation circles over 15 months documents notable differences in formal patterns and functional uses of the construction in the beginning and end of the recording period.…”
Section: Respecifiying L2 Grammarmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Waring (2018, 2019), for example, showed how interactional practices for turn‐taking and sequential organization can be approached as teachable objects (see also Wong & Waring, 2010). Teaching materials and pedagogic frameworks do not always capture the variety of pragmatic aspects and interactional functions of linguistic resources, as the studies by Theodórsdóttir & Eskildsen (2022, this issue), and by Pekarek Doehler & Skogmyr Marian (2022, this issue) indicate. As Greer & Nanbu (2022, this issue) show, it is also possible that pedagogical approaches that emphasize written grammar influence L2 speakers’ ability to deploy linguistic resources in locally appropriate ways and give rise to practices related to written texts.…”
Section: Implications For Language Educationmentioning
The articles in this special issue contribute to understanding the interactional grounding of language learning by scrutinizing how patterns of language use emerge and get routinized as dynamic resources for accomplishing actions in co-constructed interaction. Their findings problematize how grammar is represented in second language (L2) teaching materials and have important implications for future research and language pedagogy. In this commentary, we address some of these implications focusing on two questions: (a) how the studies change the conceptualization of grammar as an object of L2 learning and teaching, and (b) how the insights of this research can inform language teaching.
“…The studies reported here—in particular, those by Theodórsdóttir & Eskildsen (2022, this issue), Hellermann & Thorne (2022, this issue), and Pekarek Doehler & Skogmyr Marian (2022, this issue)—align with earlier work that stresses the value of rewilding language education (Thorne et al., 2021) in the form of pedagogical frameworks and infrastructures that center on L2 learners’ needs and experiences of language use outside the classroom. This addresses “the challenge of how to dynamically integrate formal learning settings with the vibrancy and diversity of linguistic, experiential, and situational contexts out in the world” (Hellermann & Thorne, 2022, this issue, p. 93).…”
Section: Implications For Language Educationsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…Second, similarly to Theodórsdóttir and Eskildsen's work, they point to the importance of examining how L2 usage patterns adjust to and develop in response to local interactional needs. This lends support to the argument that “grammatical routines may be motivated by social‐interactional exigencies” (Pekarek Doehler & Skogmyr Marian, 2022, this issue, p. 40; see also Couper–Kuhlen, 2011; Pekarek Doehler & Balaman, 2021). Importantly, the detailed qualitative analysis of the data reveals that the different uses of the multiword expression intertwine with precise embodied displays—in particular, recurrent gaze patterns.…”
Section: Respecifiying L2 Grammarsupporting
confidence: 58%
“…The study by Pekarek Doehler & Skogmyr Marian (2022, this issue) traces the developmental trajectory of the multiword construction comment on dit [how do you say] in French focusing on the interplay of linguistic, prosodic, and embodied resources in turn construction. The authors’ careful analysis of longitudinal data from one learner's interactions in L2 French conversation circles over 15 months documents notable differences in formal patterns and functional uses of the construction in the beginning and end of the recording period.…”
Section: Respecifiying L2 Grammarmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Waring (2018, 2019), for example, showed how interactional practices for turn‐taking and sequential organization can be approached as teachable objects (see also Wong & Waring, 2010). Teaching materials and pedagogic frameworks do not always capture the variety of pragmatic aspects and interactional functions of linguistic resources, as the studies by Theodórsdóttir & Eskildsen (2022, this issue), and by Pekarek Doehler & Skogmyr Marian (2022, this issue) indicate. As Greer & Nanbu (2022, this issue) show, it is also possible that pedagogical approaches that emphasize written grammar influence L2 speakers’ ability to deploy linguistic resources in locally appropriate ways and give rise to practices related to written texts.…”
Section: Implications For Language Educationmentioning
The articles in this special issue contribute to understanding the interactional grounding of language learning by scrutinizing how patterns of language use emerge and get routinized as dynamic resources for accomplishing actions in co-constructed interaction. Their findings problematize how grammar is represented in second language (L2) teaching materials and have important implications for future research and language pedagogy. In this commentary, we address some of these implications focusing on two questions: (a) how the studies change the conceptualization of grammar as an object of L2 learning and teaching, and (b) how the insights of this research can inform language teaching.
“…It depended on CA researchers adopting a more diachronic approach to investigate the learning of social practices (Hall, 2004; Larsen–Freeman, 2004). In their present contribution to this special issue, it seems to me that Pekarek Doehler and Skogmyr Marian (2022, this issue) have met this challenge. An important decision they made was to have the focus of their research emerge from the data, not from a preordained linguistic category.…”
The data-rich articles in this special issue invite readers to consider how grammar and multimodality enact social practices. In particular, they propose a reconceptualization of grammar, moving beyond an autonomous system of items and combinatorial rules to demonstrate how grammar is an embodied resource for social interaction. In this discussion, I build on this important reconceptualization of grammar in order to identify cross-cutting themes-themes that result from combining research methodologies and connecting the research reported on here with that originating from other disciplines, especially that inspired by complex dynamic systems theory. My intention is to urge all researchers not only to pursue their own research agendas but also to build on existing common ground, in order to overcome fractionalization and to contribute to our mutual understanding.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.