2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.stem.2015.07.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Functional Correction of Large Factor VIII Gene Chromosomal Inversions in Hemophilia A Patient-Derived iPSCs Using CRISPR-Cas9

Abstract: Hemophilia A is an X-linked genetic disorder caused by mutations in the F8 gene, which encodes the blood coagulation factor VIII. Almost half of all severe hemophilia A cases result from two gross (140-kbp or 600-kbp) chromosomal inversions that involve introns 1 and 22 of the F8 gene, respectively. We derived induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) from patients with these inversion genotypes and used CRISPR-Cas9 nucleases to revert these chromosomal segments back to the WT situation. We isolated inversion-cor… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
190
0
6

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 268 publications
(201 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
5
190
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…47,48,58 Introduction of 2 engineered nucleases can result in targeted deletion or inversion, duplication, local indels at nuclease cleavage sites, or translocations/ chromosomal rearrangements. [60][61][62][63][64][65][66][67][68][69][70][71][72][73] Here, we review genome-editing approaches for genetic correction and disruption strategies for the b-hemoglobinopathies as summarized in Figure 1 and Table 1.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…47,48,58 Introduction of 2 engineered nucleases can result in targeted deletion or inversion, duplication, local indels at nuclease cleavage sites, or translocations/ chromosomal rearrangements. [60][61][62][63][64][65][66][67][68][69][70][71][72][73] Here, we review genome-editing approaches for genetic correction and disruption strategies for the b-hemoglobinopathies as summarized in Figure 1 and Table 1.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…23 There is considerable enthusiasm in the molecular biology community concerning the utility of this technology, and the momentum of CRISPRCas9 advances has been dramatic. 24 However, despite the fact that mutant coagulation gene editing has already been reported in vitro, 25 several critical limitations to this technology remain. The achievable efficiency of mutation correction is still low, and perhaps more problematic is the potential for damaging off-target editing events elsewhere in the genome.…”
Section: Gene Therapy Strategies For Coagulation Disordersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the challenge is to invert a much larger region that is eight times more prevalent than aforementioned 140-kbp inversion. Park et al successfully used the clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeat (CRISPR)/CRISPR-associated (Cas) system to correct these regions in patient-specific iPSCs (82). Combining these gene editing tools with iPSC technology would provide a source of endothelial progenitor cells for transplantation therapies.…”
Section: Cell Therapymentioning
confidence: 99%