2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.135886
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Functional connectivity network between terrestrial and aquatic habitats by a generalist waterbird, and implications for biovectoring

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
59
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(67 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
1
59
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The only groups that presented consistent habitat use in both seasons were those of small wading birds and opportunistic gulls. Opportunistic gulls showed higher richness in fish ponds, which is likely to be related to their preference for establishing breeding colonies in this area (as for other Laridae, Ramírez et al, 2012) as well as their use of ponds as roost sites when making daily flights to feed in ricefields or landfills outside our study area (Martín‐Vélez et al., 2020). Small wading birds were less represented in natural wetlands than in all other wetland types.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…The only groups that presented consistent habitat use in both seasons were those of small wading birds and opportunistic gulls. Opportunistic gulls showed higher richness in fish ponds, which is likely to be related to their preference for establishing breeding colonies in this area (as for other Laridae, Ramírez et al, 2012) as well as their use of ponds as roost sites when making daily flights to feed in ricefields or landfills outside our study area (Martín‐Vélez et al., 2020). Small wading birds were less represented in natural wetlands than in all other wetland types.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…The white stork (Ciconia ciconia) is a much larger waterbird also known to feed on crayfish within rice fields (Tablado et al, 2010), but its role in endozoochory is unknown. Both these species are benefitting from the expansion of artificial habitats, and can show high functional connectivity between different habitat types (Bécares et al, 2019;Martín-Vélez et al, 2020), increasing their potential as plant vectors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Preference of LBBG for arti cial wetlands other than rice elds was also strong at the individual scale. Arti cial shponds were selected strongly by a subset of tracked gulls, whereas the natural marshes of 2018; Martín-Vélez et al 2019, 2020. Gulls are also likely to disperse genes for antimicrobial resistance into rice elds, both when feeding at land lls or when roosting in the nearby river, which is contaminated with urban wastewaters (Ahlstrom et al 2019).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They have consequently bene tted from the increasing development of many areas within their global distribution, exhibiting rapidly increasing population trends in anthropogenic areas across their range (Calladine 2004 of Europe, and decreased availability of sheries discards from altered shing practices have led to a larger dependence of gulls on terrestrial and anthropogenic foods (Harris, 1965;Camphuysen, 1995;Oro, 1996). The spatial shift in Larus gulls and their growing use of food resources associated with humans raises concerns about their environmental and societal impacts, especially given their known role as biovectors, linking terrestrial and aquatic as well as anthropogenic and ecological systems (Martín-Veléz et al, 2019, 2020. For example, increased availability of terrestrial food in anthropogenic landscapes has led to roosting of large numbers of gulls on inland water bodies, with important impacts on water quality (Byappanahalli et al 2015, Winton & River 2017.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation