1992
DOI: 10.1016/0092-8674(92)90187-h
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Functional antagonism between c-Jun and MyoD proteins: A direct physical association

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

12
244
0
3

Year Published

1993
1993
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 395 publications
(259 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
12
244
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Third, the AP-1 proteins can interact with proteins outside the family, resulting in complexes with unique DNA binding and transcription activity. Examples for this type of interaction include c-Jun binding to the Ets domain of PU.1, directing the complex to the PU.1 binding site in the M-CSF receptor promoter for transcriptional activation (Behre et al, 1999), whereas, the c-Jun/MyoD complex is recruited to the MyoD promoter to inhibit myogenesis (Bengal et al, 1992).…”
Section: C-jun a Member Of The Ap-1 Complexmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Third, the AP-1 proteins can interact with proteins outside the family, resulting in complexes with unique DNA binding and transcription activity. Examples for this type of interaction include c-Jun binding to the Ets domain of PU.1, directing the complex to the PU.1 binding site in the M-CSF receptor promoter for transcriptional activation (Behre et al, 1999), whereas, the c-Jun/MyoD complex is recruited to the MyoD promoter to inhibit myogenesis (Bengal et al, 1992).…”
Section: C-jun a Member Of The Ap-1 Complexmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although deletion studies have demonstrated that cell transformation requires the general presence of the DNA binding domain , this need may result from speci®c conformational requirements necessary for protein ± protein interactions rather than speci®c DNA binding requirements. In support of this model, Jun is known to indirectly in¯uence the expression of promoters through non AP-1 binding sites as a result of interactions with a variety of non leucine zipper containing transcription factors such as the glucocorticoid receptor (GR), NF-kB, NF-1, MyoD, and NFAT (Bengal et al, 1992;Boise et al, 1993;Kerppola and Curran, 1993;Miner and Yamamoto, 1992;Robinson et al, 1995;SchuÈ le et al, 1990;Stein et al, 1993a,b;Touray et al, 1991;Yang-Yen et al, 1990. Many of these interactions require the presence of the DNA binding domain but do not necessarily require AP-1 target recognition.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Drosophila, a HLH protein emc lacking a basic motif, acts as a negative regulator of the bHLHZip protein achaete-scute (Ellis et al, 1990;Garrell and Modolell, 1990). Moreover, the bZip protein, Jun, and the bHLHZip protein, MyoD, form complexes and mutually down-regulate their transactivation (Bengal et al, 1992). Finally, it was reported that in vitro Fos interacts with FIP, a bHLHZip protein, closely related to USF (Blanar and Rutter, 1992), although the selectivity of this interaction was not well investigated.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%